UK Parliament / Open data

Commons Bill [HL]

Debate on bills and Committee proceeding on Wednesday, 2 November 2005, in the House of Lords.
Commons Bill (HL). Lords Committee stage third day. Grand Committee off the floor of the House (Moses room). Schedules 1 and 2 as amended agreed to. Clauses 22-29 agreed to, Clause 23 as amended. Clause 30 under consideration. New clauses considered.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
675 c67-130GC 
Session
2005-06
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Legislative stage
Committee stage
Procedure
New clauses
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Related items
Commons Bill (HL). Explanatory Notes HL Bill 11-EN also published.
Monday, 27 June 2005
Bills
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Lord Bach | 675 c68GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendments Nos. 107 and 108:"Page 31, line 20, after ““its”” insert ““provisional””""Page 31, ...
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer | 675 c68-9GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment No. 111 stands in my name. The amendment inquires of the Minister whether the words ““regu...

Show all contributions (162)
Lord Williams of Elvel | 675 c71GC (Link to this contribution) I am aware that the timing in Wales is for the National Assembly, but I hope that my noble friend, w...
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton | 675 c72-3GC (Link to this contribution) The amendment would mean that only commons registration authorities could be given a power to set th...
Lord Bach | 675 c76-8GC (Link to this contribution) We certainly have some sympathy with the noble Lord, Lord Rotherwick, and other noble Lords regardin...
Lord Bach | 675 c79GC (Link to this contribution) Let me be as clear as I can. No, I did not mention statutory commons in my answer.
Lord Walpole | 675 c80GC (Link to this contribution) I rise at last to say something on the Bill. I declare an interest as the owner of one end of a comm...
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 675 c95GC (Link to this contribution) I have much sympathy with the noble Earl who has just spoken. The principles elicited by the noble L...
Earl of Caithness | 675 c105GC (Link to this contribution) In principle I am attracted by the amendment, but I see a huge difficulty. As we know, Natural Engla...
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 675 c104-5GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 134:"Page 14, line 37, at end insert—" ““(   )   Commons associations shall ha...
Duke of Montrose | 675 c109GC (Link to this contribution) I wonder whether the Minister understood that my amendment merely stated that the two authorities sh...
Lord Tyler | 675 c119-20GC (Link to this contribution) I shall speak to Amendments Nos. 143 and 144. I must immediately tell the Committee that they were t...
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer | 675 c121GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Government for moving as far as they have in addressing the concerns that many of us rai...
Earl Peel | 675 c124GC (Link to this contribution) Is the noble Lord seriously saying that he expects a grazier on a common to take access consideratio...
Earl of Caithness | 675 c118-9GC (Link to this contribution) moved, as an amendment to Amendment No. 142, Amendment No. 142A:"Line 4, leave out paragraphs (a) an...
Baroness Fookes | 675 c118GC (Link to this contribution) Before I put the question, I should point out that if Amendment No. 142 is agreed to, I cannot call ...
Lord Bach | 675 c130GC (Link to this contribution) On 28-day closures, my advice is that commoners do not have that power; it is a power either for the...
Lord Bach | 675 c128-9GC (Link to this contribution) I am always open to suggestions, but I have to say that we think we have this provision right. That ...
Baroness Byford | 675 c67-8GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 106:"Page 31, line 19, leave out ““during”” and insert ““throughout””" The nobl...
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton | 675 c68GC (Link to this contribution) We will give further consideration to the two issues raised in the amendment to which the noble Baro...
Lord Williams of Elvel | 675 c70GC (Link to this contribution) I am most grateful to my noble friend for his response on all the amendments. On the time period, as...
Duke of Montrose | 675 c70-1GC (Link to this contribution) I just want to give my backing to the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Williams, about the timing,...
Lord Bach | 675 c71GC (Link to this contribution) I do understand that, but that is why I mentioned yesterday that we propose a pilot implementation t...
Baroness Byford | 675 c73GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for her response and will look carefully at what she said. I accept that the fe...
Lord Bach | 675 c73GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendments Nos. 118 to 120:"Page 12, line 23, at end insert—" ““(ga)   the persons who must ...
Lord Bach | 675 c82GC (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord is an expert on the CROW Act. He will know that under that Act, the access management...
Lord Bach | 675 c82GC (Link to this contribution) In general terms, the answer is no, there can be no assurance, particularly as far as devolution is ...
Lord Inglewood | 675 c85-6GC (Link to this contribution) Having heard the remarks of the noble Lord, Lord Tyler, it struck me that in the first half of his r...
Earl Peel | 675 c86GC (Link to this contribution) I support my noble friend Lord Inglewood. I rather agree with him in his analysis of the speech by t...
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer | 675 c82-3GC (Link to this contribution) I thank Members of the Committee who have spoken in this short debate. They have raised some very in...
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 675 c86-7GC (Link to this contribution) I find it difficult to speak from the Front Bench, given the different views that have been put over...
Lord Greaves | 675 c86GC (Link to this contribution) I would not presume or dare to talk about Wales in these circumstances. In England, the administrati...
Lord Williams of Elvel | 675 c89GC (Link to this contribution) I want to pick up what the noble Baroness said. My understanding was that my noble friend said that ...
Lord Rotherwick | 675 c92GC (Link to this contribution) This may not be the most appropriate time to go into this matter—it may arise later—but the Minister...
Lord Bach | 675 c91-2GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to Members of the Committee. I shall do my best to answer them. Remember that Natural ...
Lord Greaves | 675 c92GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for his attempts to answer some of the questions I asked. He will prob...
Lord Greaves | 675 c92GC (Link to this contribution) My only comment to that is that I wonder how they know what resources will be needed to bring this i...
Lord Tyler | 675 c92-3GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister and to Members of the Committee for their contributions to this debate...
Duke of Montrose | 675 c93GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 127:"Page 14, line 22, leave out ““substantial support”” and insert ““majority s...
Earl of Caithness | 675 c94-5GC (Link to this contribution) I support the amendment of my noble friend the Duke of Montrose. As the Minister is aware—I mentione...
Lord Bach | 675 c95-6GC (Link to this contribution) Both the amendments that we are debating are related to the type of support required to determine wh...
Duke of Montrose | 675 c97GC (Link to this contribution) I am most grateful to all Members of the Committee who have participated in the debate, which perhap...
Baroness Byford | 675 c97-8GC (Link to this contribution) I shall speak to Amendment No. 130, which is grouped with Amendments Nos. 129 and 131. We are again ...
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 675 c98GC (Link to this contribution) I support the noble Baroness’s amendment. Exercising rights are crucial in this respect and I think ...
Lord Inglewood | 675 c97GC (Link to this contribution) Can ““substantial”” include a minority? Is it substantial if it is a minority?
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 675 c104GC (Link to this contribution) In responding to the debate, which has been short but very useful, I should say that I appreciate th...
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton | 675 c104GC (Link to this contribution) I think the answer I can give my—oh! I was going to say ““my noble friend”” as we go back all those ...
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton | 675 c105GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the noble Earl; he put it more succinctly than I could have done. One problem that could ari...
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton | 675 c106-7GC (Link to this contribution) We are not able to favour the request contained in the amendment to put the sort of representation t...
Lord Williams of Elvel | 675 c111GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Baroness for opposing that Clause 28 stand part of the Bill. The clause i...
Baroness Byford | 675 c110-1GC (Link to this contribution) I nearly hesitate even to speak to this, because I am sure that if the Minister does not wish to acc...
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer | 675 c107GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Byford, for those words. I will look again at the amendment in the ...
Baroness Byford | 675 c107GC (Link to this contribution) The noble Baroness, Lady Miller, has raised an interesting point, although I do not support her in t...
Lord Inglewood | 675 c103GC (Link to this contribution) On the principle that the noble Lord, Lord Livsey, has described behind the provision, my understand...
Baroness Byford | 675 c101GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for his comments. I wonder whether, before we come back on Report, he ...
Lord Bach | 675 c100-1GC (Link to this contribution) The noble Baroness will not be surprised to hear that I do not agree with her opposition to the Ques...
Baroness Byford | 675 c100GC (Link to this contribution) I echo the words of the noble Lord, Lord Williams of Elvel, when he said that this part of the Bill ...
Lord Williams of Elvel | 675 c99-100GC (Link to this contribution) I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 130 and 13...
Baroness Byford | 675 c99GC (Link to this contribution) As we go through the Bill, it is interesting how amendments spark and receive different responses, w...
Baroness Byford | 675 c120-1GC (Link to this contribution) I shall speak to Amendment No. 145, which is in this group. I also thank the Minister for listening ...
Lord Greaves | 675 c123-4GC (Link to this contribution) I put it on record that on balance I agree with what the noble Earl, Lord Peel, has just said. I wel...
Lord Bach | 675 c125GC (Link to this contribution) This is a very interesting debate on a very interesting topic. The noble Lord, Lord Tyler, was typic...
Lord Tyler | 675 c125GC (Link to this contribution) I am very grateful to the Minister. Is he saying that the association will not even have a right to ...
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 675 c126GC (Link to this contribution) A big issue that has not yet arisen is the increase in what I would describe as extreme sports as a ...
Lord Bach | 675 c125-6GC (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord interrupted at exactly the right moment. That is perhaps the result of years of pract...
Lord Bach | 675 c126-7GC (Link to this contribution) Before I turn to the noble Earl’s amendment, I shall return briefly to the question posed by the nob...
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer | 675 c128GC (Link to this contribution) It would be useful for Members of the Committee to know whether the Minister has taken enough comfor...
Baroness Byford | 675 c112-3GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to both noble Lords who have followed me along the line of querying the Government. Th...
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer | 675 c112GC (Link to this contribution) I am still confused by the terminology of standard terms when you read a statement like, ““members o...
Lord Bach | 675 c115GC (Link to this contribution) I hope that the noble Earl will be kind enough to give me a moment; it is a large and important ques...
Lord Bach | 675 c115GC (Link to this contribution) I shall write to the noble Earl with a full answer. So that he can take the matter away and consider...
Duke of Montrose | 675 c115-6GC (Link to this contribution) I have been interested to hear what the Minister has had to say on the matter. Whether I am recommen...
Lord Greaves | 675 c129-30GC (Link to this contribution) Just because I think that the Government are largely right on this provision, it does not mean that ...
Lord Bach | 675 c67GC (Link to this contribution) Before we begin with Amendment No. 106, I seek the Committee’s indulgence to refer to a matter we de...
Duke of Montrose | 675 c68GC (Link to this contribution) I wish to speak to Amendment No. 114 in this group. Presumably the regulations will lay down the dat...
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 675 c71GC (Link to this contribution) I totally agree with what the noble Lord has just said. It will be critical that they have a realist...
Lord Bach | 675 c69-70GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment No. 110 removes the powers in Schedule 2 for regulations to make provision for a transitio...
Lord Williams of Elvel | 675 c71GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Lord for his support. I hope that on Report my noble friend will have had...
Lord Bach | 675 c71GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 115:"Page 33, line 22, at end insert—" ““4A      Regulations under paragraph 2...
Duke of Montrose | 675 c73GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 122:"Page 13, line 17, leave out subsection (7)." The noble Duke said: This is ...
Baroness Byford | 675 c75GC (Link to this contribution) I speak to Amendment No. 123, which is in this group. I should like clarification on this matter. I ...
Lord Rotherwick | 675 c78GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for a very sympathetic answer. I am delighted to hear that funding will follow ...
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 675 c78-9GC (Link to this contribution) Did I understand the Minister to say that the funding was specific to statutory commons? I got the i...
Lord Rotherwick | 675 c79GC (Link to this contribution) I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 122B to 12...
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer | 675 c79-80GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 125:"After Clause 24, insert the following new clause-"    ““COSTS UNDER PART ...
Lord Rotherwick | 675 c82GC (Link to this contribution) Do I understand that if money is given to the council in Wales to change the register into electroni...
Lord Williams of Elvel | 675 c81GC (Link to this contribution) I was interested to hear what my noble friend said about targeting. Will he confirm that any financi...
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 675 c81GC (Link to this contribution) I shall just add to what the noble Lord, Lord Williams, said. We have an area, in Powys, that is sim...
Baroness Byford | 675 c81GC (Link to this contribution) I want to speak before the noble Baroness comes back on the matter. I am grateful to the Minister fo...
Lord Greaves | 675 c82GC (Link to this contribution) I am confused by the answers to the pertinent questions put by the noble Baroness, Lady Byford, but ...
Lord Williams of Elvel | 675 c85GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Tyler, for moving the amendment, but I am bound to say that I ...
Lord Bach | 675 c83GC (Link to this contribution) I agree. There are some issues that are unresolved, although we have done our best to answer the que...
Lord Tyler | 675 c83-5GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 126:"Page 14, line 13, at end insert—" ““(   )   In preparing a proposed order...
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer | 675 c90GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I can add to the permutations of my noble friend Lord Greaves. One of the drivers for the Bi...
Baroness Byford | 675 c89GC (Link to this contribution) I come back to the first comment that the Minister made. I am not sure that I heard him correctly. I...
Lord Bach | 675 c92GC (Link to this contribution) Let me do my best. If areas have to be designated as SSSIs, that gives a hint as to whether they wou...
Earl Peel | 675 c90-1GC (Link to this contribution) Following what the noble Baroness, Lady Miller, has said, clearly English Nature or Natural England,...
Viscount Allenby of Megiddo | 675 c93GC (Link to this contribution) Before calling Amendment No. 127, I have to inform the Committee that if this amendment were to be a...
Lord Williams of Elvel | 675 c93-4GC (Link to this contribution) It may be useful to the Committee if I speak to Amendment No. 128 in my name. It is grouped with tha...
Earl Peel | 675 c96GC (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord used an interesting word. He said ““majority””. This is the first time that word has ...
Lord Bach | 675 c96-7GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Earl. As I said the word, I thought ““This is the first time that I have ...
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer | 675 c105GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 135:"Page 14, line 39, at end insert—" ““(   )   A commons association shall, ...
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton | 675 c103GC (Link to this contribution) I shall write to the noble Lord if I am wrong, but my understanding is that there is nothing between...
Lord Greaves | 675 c103-4GC (Link to this contribution) The Minister has just given the assurance that the noble Lord, Lord Inglewood, was asking for, but I...
Duke of Montrose | 675 c107-8GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 136:"Page 15, line 2, leave out ““authority must”” and insert ““authorities must...
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton | 675 c102-3GC (Link to this contribution) As the noble Lord, Lord Livsey, said, Amendment No. 132 would enable an existing commoners associati...
Baroness Byford | 675 c101GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for that. Obviously, we cannot divide in Grand Committee, so I have no option b...
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 675 c121-2GC (Link to this contribution) Before I discuss Amendment No. 147, I refer to the Animals Act 1971 in view of the discussion that h...
Lord Greaves | 675 c124GC (Link to this contribution) I am asking the question, rather than saying anything. There is clearly an interaction between sheep...
Lord Bach | 675 c128GC (Link to this contribution) If I have not responded to the noble Earl, I apologise. Let me try to respond to the noble Baroness....
Earl Peel | 675 c127-8GC (Link to this contribution) The noble Baroness’s comments have jogged my memory. The other day when we were having the debate in...
Baroness Byford | 675 c128GC (Link to this contribution) I know that it is late, so I will not press the matter. Perhaps the Minister and his team can look a...
Lord Bach | 675 c128GC (Link to this contribution) I think that I have answered the noble Baroness, but I will try and do so again. I made it clear in ...
Earl of Caithness | 675 c115GC (Link to this contribution) Will the Minister expand a little on that? My noble friend the Duke of Montrose and the noble Lord, ...
Lord Williams of Elvel | 675 c113-4GC (Link to this contribution) It might be for the convenience of the Committee if I spoke now rather than opposing the Question th...
Baroness Byford | 675 c113GC (Link to this contribution) That is interesting. I think the noble Lord is well able to bat for himself, but I understand that w...
Lord Bach | 675 c116-8GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 142:"Page 16, line 11, leave out subsections (1) and (2) and insert—" ““(1)   ...
Baroness Byford | 675 c68GC (Link to this contribution) I am very grateful to the Minister and beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, wi...
Baroness Byford | 675 c67GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for clarifying that point. I will look at Hansard from yesterday and note the c...
Baroness Pitkeathley | 675 c67GC (Link to this contribution) I call Amendment No. 106. Schedule 1 [Rectification of mistakes etc under the 1965 Act]:
Lord Williams of Elvel | 675 c68GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 110:"Page 32, line 7, leave out paragraph 2." The noble Lord said: I want to ra...
Baroness Byford | 675 c71-2GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 117:"Page 12, line 20, leave out ““person”” and insert ““commons registration au...
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton | 675 c73-4GC (Link to this contribution) Subsection (7) permits regulations to enable the Church Commissioners to act with respect to land or...
Duke of Montrose | 675 c74GC (Link to this contribution) That reply is certainly of interest. One would have thought that the Church Commissioners already ha...
Lord Rotherwick | 675 c74-5GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 122A:"Page 13, line 21, leave out ““may”” and insert ““shall””" The noble Lord ...
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 675 c75-6GC (Link to this contribution) I speak to Amendment No. 124, which is in this group. I draw the Committee’s attention to the diffic...
Lord Bach | 675 c79GC (Link to this contribution) I hope I did not say that. I do not think I did.
Lord Bach | 675 c81-2GC (Link to this contribution) I shall do my best to answer some of those questions. The noble Baroness asked about ring-fencing. W...
Lord Bach | 675 c80-1GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment No. 125 gives us a chance to have some debate about costs. In general terms, we expect per...
Viscount Ullswater | 675 c85GC (Link to this contribution) I do not often find myself in agreement with the noble Lord, Lord Williams, but on this occasion I d...
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer | 675 c83GC (Link to this contribution) That would be very helpful. On that basis, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by le...
Lord Bach | 675 c87-9GC (Link to this contribution) This is the first debate on Part 2 of the Bill. It has been a very good debate on an important topic...
Lord Greaves | 675 c89-90GC (Link to this contribution) I am sure that that last comment is absolutely right, as a passionate supporter of devolution and mo...
Lord Bach | 675 c92GC (Link to this contribution) We have no set idea how many. That is an impossible question to answer at this stage. If we had such...
Lord Inglewood | 675 c95GC (Link to this contribution) I support those who have underlined the importance of localism, if I can put it that way, in the est...
Lord Bach | 675 c97GC (Link to this contribution) ““Substantial”” does not have to be a majority, so it can be a minority.
Lord Williams of Elvel | 675 c97GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 129:"Page 14, line 26, leave out paragraph (a)." The noble Lord said: It may be...
Earl Peel | 675 c98GC (Link to this contribution) I understand where my noble friend is coming from on this and I can support it up to a point. I agre...
Lord Bach | 675 c98-9GC (Link to this contribution) I hope that my noble friend will forgive me if I do not return to the arguments that we had in the u...
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 675 c105GC (Link to this contribution) I heard what the Minister and the noble Earl said. Some commons associations feel disadvantaged in t...
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton | 675 c110GC (Link to this contribution) I can reassure the noble Baroness. As she said, the draft constitution guidance is being circulated....
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer | 675 c109-10GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 137:"Page 15, line 4, at end insert—" ““(   )   Regulations under subsection (...
Lord Bach | 675 c108-9GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment No. 136 requires the Secretary of State and the National Assembly for Wales to agree on re...
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer | 675 c110GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for her reply. With the proviso that she has given of the parallel with local g...
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 675 c101-2GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 132:"After Clause 26, insert the following new clause—"    ““TRANSFORMATION TO...
Earl Peel | 675 c122-3GC (Link to this contribution) I listened with great interest to the debate. I congratulate my noble friend Lord Caithness on havin...
Lord Rotherwick | 675 c124-5GC (Link to this contribution) I hope I have not got this wrong, but in Amendment No. 142, which the Minister introduced and for wh...
Baroness Byford | 675 c127GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for his comments on our contributions. Will he confirm—I think he nearly did—th...
Lord Bach | 675 c112GC (Link to this contribution) It is a draft constitution. As I said, it will be open to consultation before a final version is put...
Lord Bach | 675 c111-2GC (Link to this contribution) I will do my best to enlighten my noble friend. We think that it will make it much easier for common...
Lord Bach | 675 c114-5GC (Link to this contribution) The amendments make small changes to the illustrative lists of terms which can be included in the st...
Duke of Montrose | 675 c113GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 139:"Page 15, line 40, at end insert ““from monies owned by the commons associat...
Lord Williams of Elvel | 675 c113GC (Link to this contribution) I am sorry to intervene. I know that my noble friend does not need my defence, but I am coming to hi...
Earl of Caithness | 675 c115GC (Link to this contribution) That was my first question; the second was on the running.
Lord Bach | 675 c115GC (Link to this contribution) Was the noble Earl’s question about the setting up of commons associations? Did I hear him correctly...
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer | 675 c115GC (Link to this contribution) While the Minister consults for a moment, I would like to preview some of the amendments that we wil...
Lord Williams of Elvel | 675 c115GC (Link to this contribution) I do not wish to intervene—I am sure that my noble friend is preparing a response to the noble Earl—...
Lord Bach | 675 c130GC (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 148:"Page 16, line 16, leave out from ““association”” to ““include”” in line 17 ...
Lord Bach | 675 c130GC (Link to this contribution) This may be a convenient moment for the Committee to adjourn until Wednesday 9 November at 3.30 pm. ...
Earl of Caithness | 675 c130GC (Link to this contribution) I am sure the Committee is grateful for the very full and detailed replies the Minister has given. W...
Subjects
Access
Applications
Agriculture
Costs
Common land
Attitudes to
ICT
Functions
Land use
Grazing land
Local government
Membership
Management
Maps
Registration
Voting rights
Transitional arrangements
Wildlife
Rules of procedure
Voluntary work
Sites of special scientific interest
Commons councils
Village greens
Legislation
Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk
Back to top