UK Parliament / Open data

Growth and Infrastructure Bill

Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bills on Tuesday, 22 January 2013, in the House of Lords.
Clauses 1 to 3 agreed to. Schedule 1 agreed to. Part 2 of 2.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
742 cc1089-1108 
Session
2012-13
Legislative stage
Committee stage
Procedure
New clauses
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Growth and Infrastructure Bill 2012-13. Brought from the Commons.
Tuesday, 18 December 2012
Bills
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 742 c1089 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord McKenzie of Luton

19: Clause 1, page 2, line 32, at end insert—

“...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 742 c1089 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, Amendment 19 is a probing amendment, which I hope will not detain us for long. So far a...


Show all contributions (32)
Baroness Hanham | 742 cc1089-1092 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I want to make absolutely clear the level of service that an applicant can expect from ...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 742 c1092 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to the Minister for her response. I may have missed it, but I do not think she said...

Baroness Hanham | 742 c1092 (Link to this contribution)

May I write to the noble Lord on that? I am not sure about the 80% but I will write to him.

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 742 c1092 (Link to this contribution)

That is fine. I am grateful for that and beg leave to withdraw the amendment.

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 742 c1092 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord McKenzie of Luton

38A: Clause 1, page 3, line 13, at end insert—

...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 742 cc1092-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this amendment is grouped with Clause 1 stand part and we are happy to take it on that ...

Baroness Hanham | 742 cc1094-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord for tabling this stand part debate as it gives me an op...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 742 c1096 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank the Minister for her reply, though I am bound to say that it did not come as a ...

Lord Tope | 742 cc1097-8 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Tope

39: After Clause 1, insert the following new Clause—

“Greate...

Lord Tope | 742 cc1098-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, in moving Amendment 39, I shall speak also to Amendment 80, both of which stand in my n...

Lord Jenkin of Roding | 742 cc1099-1100 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, due to procrastination, I did not ask for my name to be added to those of the noble Lor...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 742 c1100 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I listened carefully to the noble Lord, Lord Tope, who moved the amendment, and to the ...

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon | 742 cc1100-1 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I will explain the Government’s position on this amendment. I was amused when my noble ...

Lord Beecham | 742 c1101 (Link to this contribution)

Can the Minister indicate whether it is the Government’s intention to consult the Mayor of London...

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon | 742 c1102 (Link to this contribution)

It is the standard procedure. We continue to consult the Mayor of London’s office on a raft of is...

Lord Tope | 742 c1102 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, mention was made of the reference which I and my noble friend Lord Jenkin made to the o...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 742 c1102 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord McKenzie of Luton

40: Schedule 1, page 39, line 16, after “may” insert ...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 742 c1103 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this amendment concerns the arrangements when an application has been made to the Secre...

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon | 742 c1103 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this provision in Schedule 1 allows a new inspector to be appointed in cases where, for...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 742 c1103 (Link to this contribution)

I thank the Minister for that reply. I understand the thrust of it and I understand that probity ...

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon | 742 c1104 (Link to this contribution)

I think that my noble friend has already undertaken to write to the noble Lord on the other point...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 742 c1104 (Link to this contribution)

I thank the Minister for that and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 742 c1104 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord McKenzie of Luton

41: Clause 2, page 3, line 20, after “direct,” insert...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 742 cc1104-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, in moving Amendment 41, I will speak to Amendments 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 and 49. W...

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon | 742 cc1105-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I sought to scribble down the noble Lord’s questions as they came in. I apologise if I ...

Lord Greaves | 742 c1107 (Link to this contribution)

The Minister said several times that the purpose is to increase the efficiency of the appeal syst...

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon | 742 c1107 (Link to this contribution)

The short answer to the second question is no. This is about making things more efficient. I am s...

Lord Greaves | 742 cc1107-8 (Link to this contribution)

I agree entirely with that. Whatever you are doing, doing it more efficiently is a good idea. How...

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon | 742 c1108 (Link to this contribution)

As I said, from my experience of life, whether in business or the public sector, it helps growth ...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 742 c1108 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am not sure that we can progress much further on this this evening. I fear that part ...

Back to top