UK Parliament / Open data

Commons Bill [HL]

Debate on bills on Monday, 17 July 2006, in the House of Lords.
Commons Bill (HL). Consideration of Commons amendments. Commons amendments considered and agreed to.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
684 c1003-27 
Session
2005-06
Legislative stage
Commons amendments
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Commons Bill (HL). Commons amendments.
Monday, 3 July 2006
Bills
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 684 c1007 (Link to this contribution) We too are very grateful. We brought forward an amendment on Third Reading with this in mind. The ma...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1008 (Link to this contribution) I can. I can also say that it was the former ministerial team who should be thanked for all this goo...

Show all contributions (46)
Lord Rooker | 684 c1008 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House does agree with the Commons in the said amendment. Amendment ...
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 684 c1008 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, some members of the commons associations will be disappointed that this amendment is being...
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 684 c1006 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, we are also happy with these amendments, particularly those relating to the definition of ...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1006 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 13 to 16. ...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1006-7 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 17. In movin...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1007 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 18 to 20. ...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1007 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 21 to 26. ...
Baroness Byford | 684 c1007 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for coming back on this matter. We had long discussions on i...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1003-4 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that this House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 1 to 4. A...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1004-5 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 5 to 12. A...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1003 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the Commons amendments be now considered. Moved accordingly, and, on Q...
Baroness Byford | 684 c1005 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank the Minister for introducing this batch of amendments. Taking them in reverse orde...
Baroness Byford | 684 c1018 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am not sure whether I am allowed simply to thank the Minister for explaining that. We we...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1018-9 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 95 and 96....
Lord Rooker | 684 c1015 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 87 to 89. ...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1015-6 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 90 to 94. ...
Baroness Byford | 684 c1016-7 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, perhaps I may take a little time to question the Minister further on Amendment No. 104, wh...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1017-8 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, not only are we at the end of the Bill, but I do not think I am in a position to query the...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1013 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House agrees with the Commons in the said amendment. As already dis...
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 684 c1014 (Link to this contribution) moved, as an amendment to Commons Amendment No. 86, Amendment No. 86A?: "86A: Clause 39, line 1, aft...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1014 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the amendment would change the formulation in Amendment No. 86 so that regulations would s...
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 684 c1014-5 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank the Minister for that response, although I anticipated that he would say that this...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1012-3 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I can confirm that. I shall put another couple of paragraphs on the record, which may help...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1010-2 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 80 to 85. ...
Baroness Byford | 684 c1012 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank the Minister for his explanation. I shall ask him about one part of it. I still ha...
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 684 c1009-10 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank the Minister very much for clarifying the situation. My ear is not quite attuned, ...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1010 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 28 to 79. ...
Baroness Byford | 684 c1009 (Link to this contribution) No, no, my Lords, it is not the Minister’s accent, I just had not quite heard what he said. I think ...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1008 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, on Amendment No. 27, I said, ““I beg to move that this House agrees with the Commons in th...
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton | 684 c1009 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the Minister said ““does agree”” but it sounded like ““disagree””.
Baroness Byford | 684 c1008 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, before I say more, perhaps the Minister could tell us what he said. I thought he said that...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1023-7 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am most grateful for noble Lords’ responses to the amendments. However, I know nothing w...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1027 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 110 to 135...
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 684 c1020-1 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, a number of points were made from these Benches on this matter, too. We welcome the explan...
Baroness Byford | 684 c1019-20 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank the Minister for explaining the amendments. I am glad to have them in the Bill, as...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1021 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 107. This is...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1021 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 100 to 106...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1021-2 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 109. I will ...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1021 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 108. Moved ...
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 684 c1023 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am sure that I speak for my noble friend Lord Tyler, who will be very pleased with Amend...
Lord Inglewood | 684 c1022-3 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I hope that I may be allowed a few moments just to say a big thank you to the Minister, hi...
Baroness Byford | 684 c1023 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I will not repeat what my noble friend Lord Inglewood has said. I am grateful to the Minis...
Lord Rooker | 684 c1009 (Link to this contribution) Oh, it is my accent, my Lords. I am sorry.
Lord Rooker | 684 c1019 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 97 to 99. ...
Back to top