My Lords, I thank the Minister for that response, although I anticipated that he would say that this can be sorted out in regulations. It is desirable that the process should be at least a degree more finite than it has been in the past. I think the Minister quoted an Act from 1922 or 1925. That is quite some time ago and the world has moved on. Perhaps he will take account of what I said in ensuring that this is taken care of in regulations. I therefore wish to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
On Question, Motion agreed to. "87: Clause 41, page 23, line 41, leave out from ““order”” to end of line 42""88: Page 23, line 43, leave out ““to remove the works and restore”” and insert ““for removal of the works and restoration of””""89: Page 24, line 3, leave out ““to carry out the works”” and insert ““for the works to be carried out””"
Commons Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Livsey of Talgarth
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 July 2006.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Commons Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
684 c1014-5 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-21 10:03:51 +0100
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_338163
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_338163
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_338163