UK Parliament / Open data

Succession to the Crown Bill

Debate on bills on Thursday, 14 February 2013, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Wallace of Tankerness.
Second reading debate agreed on question and Bill committed to a Committee of the Whole House.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
743 cc782-838 
Session
2012-13
Department
Cabinet Office
Legislative stage
Second reading
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Succession to the Crown Bill 2012-13. As brought from the Commons.
Tuesday, 29 January 2013
Bills
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 743 cc782-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I have it in command from Her Majesty the Queen to acquaint the House that Her Majesty,...

Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town | 743 cc785-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank the noble and learned Lord the Minister for opening the debate in that way. He ...


Show all contributions (59)
Lord Lang of Monkton | 743 cc787-790 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I enter this important debate with some trepidation. I cannot help wishing that the Dep...

Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 743 cc790-1 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I wish to begin by expressing admiration for the attitude that has been taken by the 16...

Lord Trefgarne | 743 c791 (Link to this contribution)

Is the Church of Scotland an established Church? I think not.

Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 743 c791 (Link to this contribution)

Yes, it is an established Church. It seems to me that the time has come to recognise that the ess...

Bishop of Exeter | 743 c791 (Link to this contribution)

I fully support the Bill, but if we are going to go into history, it is terribly important to rem...

Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 743 c792 (Link to this contribution)

I understand why they entered into our constitution but to judge people on the basis of their bel...

Lord Deben | 743 c792 (Link to this contribution)

Did my noble friend notice that the right reverend Prelate said that he did not think that those ...

Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 743 c792 (Link to this contribution)

I entirely agree with my noble friend. It seems to me that we should not allow our future disposi...

Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 743 c792 (Link to this contribution)

On both sides—I accept that. I hope that we can accept as a very valuable step in the right direc...

Lord Luce | 743 cc792-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I declare an interest as a former Lord Chamberlain of Her Majesty’s Household and I wel...

Bishop of Worcester | 743 cc794-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I welcome the Bill. The Church of England, as has been intimated, is, broadly speaking,...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 743 c795 (Link to this contribution)

I am most grateful to the right reverend Prelate for giving way. As a member of the Church of Sco...

Bishop of Worcester | 743 c795 (Link to this contribution)

Our position would be that it is very important that the monarch, as Supreme Governor of the Chur...

Lord Trefgarne | 743 cc795-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, in rising to intervene in this debate, let me start by saying that a powerful case can ...

Lord Dubs | 743 cc797-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I give this Bill my enthusiastic welcome. The issues have been debated frequently, ther...

Lord Carlile of Berriew | 743 c799 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I declare an interest as father and stepfather of five admirable females, each of whom ...

Lord Deben | 743 c800 (Link to this contribution)

As I understand it, the regent is not Supreme Governor of the Church of England, which rather sug...

Lord Carlile of Berriew | 743 cc800-1 (Link to this contribution)

I respectfully agree with my noble friend and the noble Lord, Lord Dubs, on this point.

My ...

Lord Janvrin | 743 cc801-3 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am grateful for the opportunity to contribute to this important debate. I, too, must ...

Lord Lexden | 743 cc802-4 (Link to this contribution)

Walter Bagehot wrote in 1867 that,

“one-half of the human race cares … fifty times more for...

Baroness Falkner of Margravine | 743 c804 (Link to this contribution)

I am very grateful to my noble friend for giving way. I, too, was on the Constitution Committee w...

Lord Lexden | 743 cc805-6 (Link to this contribution)

I thank my noble friend. This is a great matter. It is not possible for a child of a monarch to b...

Lord Lucas | 743 cc806-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I wholeheartedly welcome every aspect of the Bill. My peerages currently descend

...

Lord Berkeley | 743 cc808-810 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am pleased to be able to participate in this Second Reading debate because it is an i...

Viscount Astor | 743 cc810-2 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I suppose that I should declare an interest as a member of the Church of England who is...

Lord James of Blackheath | 743 cc812-3 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, 325 years ago, the streets were full of a tumult of people celebrating the fact that th...

Lord Elton | 743 c813 (Link to this contribution)

I have stood at the Dispatch Box and signalled the ceding of the royal prerogative on more than o...

Lord James of Blackheath | 743 cc813-4 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful for that intervention. The fact that that would apply in this case should be read i...

Lord Lang of Monkton | 743 c814 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful to my noble friend for giving way. I think he is mistaken. I think he is building a...

Lord James of Blackheath | 743 c814 (Link to this contribution)

I am grateful for all helpful contributions.

The Bill of Rights was read to William and Mar...

Lord James of Blackheath | 743 c815 (Link to this contribution)

1952, sorry. We have a very serious question now as to the legitimacy of the action that we are t...

Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames | 743 c815 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, may I say how much I welcome this Bill on behalf of these Benches and on my own behalf?...

Lord James of Blackheath | 743 c815 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I had anticipated the argument concerning the alteration of the Declaration of Rights, ...

Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames | 743 cc815-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am afraid that I disagree with the noble Lord because the Act of Settlement expressly...

Lord Thomas of Swynnerton | 743 cc817-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, even as the 18th speaker in this distinguished and very interesting debate, I have an o...

Lord Northbrook | 743 cc818-821 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Swynnerton. Living near Winch...

Lord Elton | 743 cc821-3 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I enter the forum with some trepidation. These are very complex and sensitive matters. ...

Lord Deben | 743 cc823-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I intervene in the gap merely to remind the House that we learn to live with anomaly—in...

Lord Stevenson of Balmacara | 743 cc824-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank all speakers for contributing to this wide-ranging debate, in which we have hea...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 743 cc828-830 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I begin by thanking all noble Lords who have taken part in the debate. It has lived up ...

Lord Berkeley | 743 c831 (Link to this contribution)

Very briefly, I understand what the Minister is saying about the Duchy of Cornwall but if there w...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 743 c831 (Link to this contribution)

I think I am right in saying that there is a council of the Duchy. Indeed, that position arose wh...

Lord Trefgarne | 743 c831 (Link to this contribution)

Perhaps I should pick up the point that my noble and learned friend made about the princedom of W...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 743 cc831-4 (Link to this contribution)

That would be a matter for the sovereign, just as the present Prince of Wales did not automatical...

Lord Deben | 743 c834 (Link to this contribution)

Before my noble and learned friend sits down, is there not a terribly simple way out? That is, to...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 743 c834 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, my noble friend makes an important contribution to that debate. I hope that he will rec...

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean | 743 c834 (Link to this contribution)

I thank my noble and learned friend for giving way. When he says that it is not an issue for this...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 743 c834 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I believe that this would go beyond the scope of the Bill. Something as profound as tha...

Lord Maclennan of Rogart | 743 c835 (Link to this contribution)

Before my noble friend leaves this matter, while recognising that the Bill may not be the right p...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 743 cc835-6 (Link to this contribution)

I am sorry to disappoint my noble friend, but the Government do not have plans to do that, althou...

Lord Lexden | 743 c836 (Link to this contribution)

Will my noble and learned friend say a word about the Lordship of Man, which I raised?

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 743 c836 (Link to this contribution)

The position with the Lordship of Man is exactly the same. No change is anticipated. The Queen wo...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 743 c836 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I beg to move that the Bill be committed to a Committee of the Whole House.

Lord Trefgarne | 743 c836 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, can I persuade my noble friend not to press this Motion at this moment? I am not remote...

Lord Wallace of Tankerness | 743 cc836-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, we were given notice that my noble friend might raise this matter. We are going to make...

Back to top