UK Parliament / Open data

Climate Change Bill [HL]

Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bills on Monday, 14 January 2008, in the House of Lords.
Climate Change Bill (HL). Lords Committee stage fifth day. Clauses 28 to 35 agreed to. Clause 36 under consideration. Part 2 of 2 records.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
697 c1139-72 
Session
2007-08
Legislative stage
Committee stage
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Climate Change Bill (HL). (Explanatory Notes HL Bill 9-EN published).
Wednesday, 14 November 2007
Bills
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Viscount Montgomery of Alamein | 697 c1149 (Link to this contribution) The noble Baroness, Lady Billingham, has made a very serious point and this may be the first amendme...
Lord Taylor of Holbeach | 697 c1147-8 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for that response from the Minister, which is very satisfactory. I hope that we can lo...

Show all contributions (65)
Baroness Billingham | 697 c1148-9 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 161: 161: Clause 30, page 15, line 39, at end insert— ““( ) advise the authori...
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin | 697 c1147 (Link to this contribution) To be fair, this is an interesting amendment. When we looked at the analysis of the amendments, we t...
Lord Redesdale | 697 c1146-7 (Link to this contribution) I speak to Amendments Nos. 159 and 160, which are tabled in my name. The noble Lord, Lord Taylor, ha...
Lord Taylor of Holbeach | 697 c1145-6 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 158A: 158A: Clause 28, page 15, line 13, leave out ““30th June”” and insert ““...
Lord Taylor of Holbeach | 697 c1145 (Link to this contribution) I knew that we had taken our time for a purpose, which was to give the Minister a chance to prepare ...
Lord Rooker | 697 c1145 (Link to this contribution) I accept that. If I have misunderstood the noble Lord, I apologise. I realise that the Committee see...
Lord Crickhowell | 697 c1144 (Link to this contribution) I do not think that Clause 48 entirely meets the point that was made in this debate. That clause sta...
Lord Rooker | 697 c1144 (Link to this contribution) At the risk of embarrassing the noble Lord further—not that he should be embarrassed—I support what ...
Lord Crickhowell | 697 c1141-2 (Link to this contribution) Not for the first time the structure of the Bill has got us into a bit of a tangle: an amendment has...
Lord Puttnam | 697 c1143 (Link to this contribution) I support the principle behind this amendment. It is particularly useful to see the noble Lord, Lord...
Earl of Selborne | 697 c1143 (Link to this contribution) Amendment No. 183B brings us to Part 4 of the Bill. We are discussing adaptation slightly out of con...
Lord Redesdale | 697 c1143-4 (Link to this contribution) I apologise for being a couple of minutes late. I want to raise, from Amendment No. 183B, the import...
Lord Teverson | 697 c1139-40 (Link to this contribution) I shall speak to Amendment No. 183B. We debated the role of the climate change committee at some len...
Baroness Young of Old Scone | 697 c1140-1 (Link to this contribution) I support Amendment No. 183B, which is tabled also in my name. The previous two contributors have al...
Lord Taylor of Holbeach | 697 c1152 (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may speak again as my contribution has been widely attacked. There are specific instances ...
Earl of Caithness | 697 c1152-3 (Link to this contribution) The noble Baroness, Lady Billingham, is very eloquent; she was very eloquent in committee and she ha...
Lord Taylor of Holbeach | 697 c1150 (Link to this contribution) What is it about an issue like this that makes normally eminently sensible people lose all reason? I...
Baroness Greengross | 697 c1149-50 (Link to this contribution) I support the noble Baroness, Lady Billingham, on this important amendment. She and others in the pa...
Lord Lyell | 697 c1150-1 (Link to this contribution) I am not sure I follow the noble Baroness as I do not know where she lives. On my left we are about ...
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer | 697 c1150 (Link to this contribution) I want to question the noble Lord a little on this. I would agree with him about days gone by—around...
Lord Puttnam | 697 c1151 (Link to this contribution) Is this a reserved or devolved issue?
Lord Rogan | 697 c1151 (Link to this contribution) In Ulster, we do not mind getting up in the early hours, in the darkness, if it helps the greater go...
Lord Whitty | 697 c1151-2 (Link to this contribution) It is not so long ago that I had some responsibility in this House for road safety and then for agri...
Lord Woolmer of Leeds | 697 c1151 (Link to this contribution) I rise only briefly to remark on the reasons given by the noble Lord, Lord Taylor, for resisting the...
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer | 697 c1170 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for giving a full reply, even at this time of night. It is an importan...
Lord Crickhowell | 697 c1168 (Link to this contribution) I will be very brief. The noble Lord, Lord Woolmer of Leeds, has rendered the Committee a very consi...
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin | 697 c1168-70 (Link to this contribution) I was asked whether the Government was going to be brave. It would be a brave Whip in the House of L...
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer | 697 c1164-6 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 165: 165: Clause 36, page 18, line 1, after ““activities”” insert ““including ...
Lord Woolmer of Leeds | 697 c1166-8 (Link to this contribution) The noble Baroness, Lady Miller, rightly anticipated that I might rise to take a somewhat different ...
Lord Rooker | 697 c1164 (Link to this contribution) I honestly was not at all irritated. I suppose the penny was dropping when I listened to the speech....
Earl Cathcart | 697 c1164 (Link to this contribution) That was quite a useful amendment and discussion. We are trying to get a single UK trading scheme, r...
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer | 697 c1171-2 (Link to this contribution) I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Lord Crickhowell | 697 c1163-4 (Link to this contribution) I do not want to delay the Committee at a time when the Captain of the Gentlemen at Arms is beginnin...
Lord Rooker | 697 c1172 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move that the House do now resume. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to.
Earl of Caithness | 697 c1157 (Link to this contribution) The Minister said something important just then. He will recall that I had a little go at him before...
Lord Rooker | 697 c1157 (Link to this contribution) I do not have the figures in great detail in front of me, but it has to be funded because this is ne...
Lord Rooker | 697 c1157 (Link to this contribution) No, I regret that I have not, except that I imagine that this is new money—Defra certainly has no mo...
Earl Cathcart | 697 c1158 (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for clarifying the situation—I think. I was comforted when he said that the pri...
Earl of Caithness | 697 c1157-8 (Link to this contribution) It might be helpful if the Minister could write to me on how much money is allocated from within its...
Lord Taylor of Holbeach | 697 c1158-9 (Link to this contribution) This whole section empowers the national authorities to give binding instructions to the Committee o...
Lord Teverson | 697 c1159 (Link to this contribution) I welcome the Question in that it gives the Minister the opportunity to explain the circumstances in...
Lord Taylor of Holbeach | 697 c1160 (Link to this contribution) I thank the noble Lord for that explanation. Clause 34 agreed to. Clause 35 agreed to. Clause 36 ...
Earl Cathcart | 697 c1160-1 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 164A: 164A: Clause 36, page 17, line 34, leave out ““relevant national authori...
Lord Teverson | 697 c1161 (Link to this contribution) We will come on to this in a later amendments. Although from these Benches we welcome devolution in ...
Lord Dixon-Smith | 697 c1161 (Link to this contribution) I would like to argue in favour of this amendment. It seems to me that we are asking for trouble. Yo...
Lord Rooker | 697 c1161-2 (Link to this contribution) With respect, I do not think the drafters of the amendment have fully appreciated its practical sign...
Lord Dixon-Smith | 697 c1163 (Link to this contribution) What the Minister is saying is that we are damned if we do and damned if we do not, and I am not sur...
Lord Rooker | 697 c1163 (Link to this contribution) I freely admit that I have not explained because we are trying to address two different issues here....
Lord Crickhowell | 697 c1157 (Link to this contribution) If I may follow that helpful statement, I am encouraged that the original budget estimates have been...
Lord Rooker | 697 c1156-7 (Link to this contribution) In the interests of getting to the nuts and bolts of this, I will give what financial information I ...
Earl Cathcart | 697 c1156 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 164: 164: Clause 31, page 16, line 14, at end insert— ““( ) Each national auth...
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin | 697 c1155 (Link to this contribution) I hope that my contribution will not be too boring in comparison to the lively and enjoyable debate ...
Earl Cathcart | 697 c1154-5 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 161A: 161A: Clause 31, page 16, line 11, at end insert ““including land or any...
Baroness Billingham | 697 c1154 (Link to this contribution) I thank all noble Lords for taking part in this debate. It certainly livened everybody up. Noble Lor...
Lord Rooker | 697 c1153-4 (Link to this contribution) I was hoping that this would continue a little while and that there would be no time for me. I have ...
Earl of Caithness | 697 c1153 (Link to this contribution) I said that we shall all have to take the pain and there will be an awful lot of pain in a wide vari...
Viscount Montgomery of Alamein | 697 c1153 (Link to this contribution) The noble Earl, Lord Caithness, talks about the inconvenience for the north of Scotland. Of course h...
Lord Taylor of Holbeach | 697 c1139 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 158: 158: Clause 28, page 15, line 11, at end insert— ““( ) The Committee’s re...
Lord Rooker | 697 c1170-1 (Link to this contribution) For the convenience of the Committee and being conscious of the time, I revert back to our previous ...
Lord Dixon-Smith | 697 c1159 (Link to this contribution) The Question gives me the chance to ask a rather stupid question: when is a national authority not a...
Earl Cathcart | 697 c1155 (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for clarifying the situation and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendm...
Lord Rooker | 697 c1158 (Link to this contribution) As I said, I will try to come back on this but I am not promising to write to the noble Earl, Lord C...
Lord Rooker | 697 c1159-60 (Link to this contribution) Clause 67 is perfectly straightforward. We are dealing with the United Kingdom body here; with the f...
Back to top