Greater London Authority Bill. Programme motion for proceedings on consideration of Lords Amendments and subsequent stages. Agreed to on question. Lords amendments considered. Lords Amendment 2 disagreed to on division (278 to 165). Committee appointed to draw up reasons to be assigned to the Lords for disagreeing to their amendments 1 and 2. Reasons reported and agreed to. Message to the Lords to communicate reasons.
Greater London Authority Bill
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
464 c480-511 
Session
2006-07
Legislative stage
Lords amendments
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Greater London Authority Bill. Lords amendments. Explanatory Notes Bill 158-EN also published.
Tuesday, 9 October 2007
Bills
House of Commons
Tuesday, 9 October 2007
Bills
House of Commons
Proceeding contributions
Robert Neill | 464 c497 (Link to this contribution)
It will be the last time. I would be grateful if the Minister would clarify a comment that he made e...
John Healey | 464 c497 (Link to this contribution)
No. I am sorry. I am finishing on that point.
For the reasons that I have set out, I urge my hon. F...
Show all contributions (102)
Tom Brake | 464 c497 (Link to this contribution)
Will the hon. Gentleman give way?
John Healey | 464 c500 (Link to this contribution)
I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.
Speaker | 464 c501 (Link to this contribution)
With this we may discuss Lords amendments Nos. 4 to 9.
John Healey | 464 c501 (Link to this contribution)
We have reached a group of amendments that the Government tabled in the other place in response to t...
Robert Neill | 464 c501 (Link to this contribution)
The Minister and I are in accord on the amendments and I am grateful to him for the spirit in which ...
Tom Brake | 464 c501-2 (Link to this contribution)
I, too, support the amendments. If I were being churlish, I would question the reason for missing ou...
Mark Field | 464 c502 (Link to this contribution)
Like other hon. Members, I support what the Government are trying to achieve. However, in view of th...
Speaker | 464 c502 (Link to this contribution)
Order. The hon. Gentleman clearly is not giving way at this moment.
Andrew Dismore | 464 c502 (Link to this contribution)
Will the hon. Gentleman give way?
Boris Johnson | 464 c502 (Link to this contribution)
Perhaps I could just say that I want very much to echo what my hon. Friend the Member for Cities of ...
Speaker | 464 c502 (Link to this contribution)
Order. I am not sure that the remit of the amendment includes who or who is not being considered as ...
Boris Johnson | 464 c503 (Link to this contribution)
I think that everybody in the House wants to see a mayoralty that responds to the wishes of local co...
Clive Efford | 464 c502 (Link to this contribution)
On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. If an hon. Member is going to make a contribution in such...
Speaker | 464 c503 (Link to this contribution)
I think that that will become evident from the remarks that they make.
Speaker | 464 c503 (Link to this contribution)
Order. The hon. Gentleman is clearly not giving way at the moment. Have you concluded your remarks, ...
John Healey | 464 c503 (Link to this contribution)
I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.
Speaker | 464 c503 (Link to this contribution)
With this it will be convenient to take Lords amendments Nos. 11 to 16.
John Healey | 464 c503-4 (Link to this contribution)
In this group we propose a number of amendments to the planning clauses of the Bill, following usefu...
Charles Walker | 464 c504 (Link to this contribution)
As someone who did not serve on the Bill Committee I am perhaps not as au fait with this matter as I...
John Healey | 464 c503 (Link to this contribution)
I welcome the hon. Gentleman to the debate. We missed his contribution and his presence in earlier d...
Robert Neill | 464 c504-5 (Link to this contribution)
I should like to deal with the detail of the amendments fairly briefly, before coming to the underly...
John Healey | 464 c504 (Link to this contribution)
The provisions in the Bill allow for the Mayor to get involved in major developments and application...
Robert Neill | 464 c505 (Link to this contribution)
I agree with my hon. Friend. A regrettable fact of London life is that the Mayor has not approached ...
Lee Scott | 464 c505 (Link to this contribution)
Does my hon. Friend agree that the amendment, however helpful in improving the position, does not le...
Tom Brake | 464 c507-8 (Link to this contribution)
I am pleased that the Mayor will not control collections, because I think that that should be the bo...
John Healey | 464 c508 (Link to this contribution)
I mentioned the implementation order in my opening remarks. We intend to introduce it as soon as pos...
John Healey | 464 c506 (Link to this contribution)
I beg to move, That the House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.
In the other place, the ...
Mark Field | 464 c505-6 (Link to this contribution)
We have rehearsed on several occasions in the House and in Committee our concerns about strategic po...
John Healey | 464 c506 (Link to this contribution)
I welcome both Opposition parties' support for the amendments, if not for the broader principles, re...
Tom Brake | 464 c505 (Link to this contribution)
I echo the hon. Gentleman's points. What the Government are proposing will certainly improve a flawe...
John Healey | 464 c508-9 (Link to this contribution)
We propose a number of amendments to the climate change clauses, following valuable scrutiny of the ...
Speaker | 464 c508 (Link to this contribution)
With this we may discuss Lords amendments Nos. 19 to 29.
John Healey | 464 c508 (Link to this contribution)
I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.
Robert Neill | 464 c509 (Link to this contribution)
I am grateful to the Minister for the way that he has introduced the amendments. We have no issue wi...
Tom Brake | 464 c509-10 (Link to this contribution)
I support the amendments without equivocation. As the Minister said, they are about sharpening the c...
John Healey | 464 c510 (Link to this contribution)
I beg to move that the House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.
Speaker | 464 c510 (Link to this contribution)
With this it will be convenient to take Lords amendment No. 31.
John Healey | 464 c510 (Link to this contribution)
Both amendments respond to recommendations from the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee...
John Healey | 464 c510 (Link to this contribution)
I beg to move, that this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.
Speaker | 464 c510 (Link to this contribution)
With this we may discuss Lords amendments Nos. 33 and 34.
John Healey | 464 c510 (Link to this contribution)
Confirmation hearings, as set out in schedule 1 to the Bill, provide an important new power for the ...
Tom Brake | 464 c511 (Link to this contribution)
I support the amendments with the same caveats about confirmation hearings. When we debated the matt...
Andy Slaughter | 464 c484 (Link to this contribution)
Will the hon. Gentleman give way?
Robert Neill | 464 c483-4 (Link to this contribution)
I am sorry that the hon. Gentleman's interventions do not become any more considered with the passag...
Andy Slaughter | 464 c484 (Link to this contribution)
I simply wish to ask a question: will this set a precedent for the Conservatives? Will there be sepa...
Robert Neill | 464 c484 (Link to this contribution)
I shall do so once more, and I hope that the hon. Gentleman's intervention will be better this time....
Robert Neill | 464 c484 (Link to this contribution)
The hon. Gentleman's intervention was not any better, and I shall not repeat my mistake.
David Evennett | 464 c484 (Link to this contribution)
My hon. Friend is making a sound and sensible speech. Londoners want there to be checks and balance ...
Robert Neill | 464 c484 (Link to this contribution)
I shall give way to my hon. Friend.
Andy Slaughter | 464 c483 (Link to this contribution)
It is uncomfortable for me to witness the hon. Gentleman wriggling. We would like to hear why, in co...
Robert Neill | 464 c483 (Link to this contribution)
I do not recall that their Lordships wanted to go into that degree of detail—although the debate ran...
Mark Field | 464 c483 (Link to this contribution)
Unlike my hon. Friend, I have not had the opportunity of reading the Hansard reports of the Lords de...
Robert Neill | 464 c482-3 (Link to this contribution)
I thank the Minister for his kind words. The matters under discussion have been an entertaining ““Lo...
Mark Field | 464 c482 (Link to this contribution)
Where towns or cities are in effect one-party states—there are perhaps more of them involving his pa...
John Healey | 464 c481-2 (Link to this contribution)
I beg to move, That this House disagrees with the Lords in the said amendment.
I welcome the hon. M...
Clive Efford | 464 c489 (Link to this contribution)
It is a curious position of principle to suggest that because someone does not like the outcome of a...
John Healey | 464 c488-9 (Link to this contribution)
The hon. Member for Bromley and Chislehurst (Robert Neill) set out some general concerns and argumen...
Simon Burns | 464 c487 (Link to this contribution)
I do not wish to upset my hon. Friend, but I should mention that the founding fathers had no view on...
Mark Field | 464 c487 (Link to this contribution)
I shall give way to a great friend of mine whose knowledge of American politics knows no limits.
Mark Field | 464 c488 (Link to this contribution)
I know that the loquaciousness of north Essex Members knows no bounds, but I think that we will leav...
Simon Burns | 464 c487 (Link to this contribution)
I have been listening carefully to my hon. Friend's thesis. Are the Liberal Democrats not taking an ...
Mark Field | 464 c487 (Link to this contribution)
To a large extent, it was. I served under Baroness Hanham as a councillor in the royal borough of Ke...
Simon Burns | 464 c487 (Link to this contribution)
Will my hon. Friend give way?
Mark Field | 464 c487 (Link to this contribution)
I shall leave it to the opponents of the hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington to make that case...
Tom Brake | 464 c487 (Link to this contribution)
The hon. Gentleman said that he thought that the official Opposition in the other place had simply r...
Mark Field | 464 c486-7 (Link to this contribution)
I regret that my party was associated with this matter in the House of Lords, because it is wholly w...
Tom Brake | 464 c486 (Link to this contribution)
I thank the hon. Gentleman. I merely restate the fact that this was not intended to be a partisan am...
Andy Slaughter | 464 c486 (Link to this contribution)
As my hon. Friend the Member for Hendon (Mr. Dismore) says, the hon. Gentleman is therefore guilty o...
Andy Slaughter | 464 c486 (Link to this contribution)
In Committee, I had the privilege of listening to the hon. Gentleman describe, in a moment of rare s...
Tom Brake | 464 c485-6 (Link to this contribution)
I do not know whether the hon. Gentleman was present during Committee, but we supported the idea of ...
Andrew Dismore | 464 c485 (Link to this contribution)
I am sure that the hon. Gentleman will correct me if I am wrong, but it was not just the official Op...
Tom Brake | 464 c484-5 (Link to this contribution)
I am pleased to return to this matter, which I raised in Committee. We had much fun with it, and I r...
Robert Neill | 464 c484 (Link to this contribution)
My hon. Friend is right. It is important to remember that the boroughs are a third key part of the e...
Mark Field | 464 c494-5 (Link to this contribution)
The Minister is right when he says that we want a strong executive Mayor. I share and understand som...
Tom Brake | 464 c495 (Link to this contribution)
The hon. Gentleman mentions deadlock. When I asked the officers of the Conservative-Liberal Democrat...
Mark Field | 464 c495-6 (Link to this contribution)
The hon. Gentleman is absolutely right. Of course, there are many examples across the country of tho...
John Healey | 464 c496 (Link to this contribution)
As I tried to explain to the House, and as the hon. Member for Cities of London and Westminster (Mr....
Robert Neill | 464 c496 (Link to this contribution)
Can the Minister help me on two short questions? First, in our tradition and process, where is there...
John Healey | 464 c496 (Link to this contribution)
The point that I was making is that the New York model does not translate. Instead of all members of...
Robert Neill | 464 c496 (Link to this contribution)
Is the Minister saying that there is any other city or town in the United Kingdom which has a direct...
John Healey | 464 c496 (Link to this contribution)
Yes.
The hon. Gentleman went on to talk about back-stairs deals. One could look at the budget proce...
John Healey | 464 c497 (Link to this contribution)
Does the hon. Gentleman wish to come back?
John Healey | 464 c489 (Link to this contribution)
My hon. Friend is right. Shortly we shall see the decisions that all hon. Members, particularly thos...
Robert Neill | 464 c492 (Link to this contribution)
I shall make a little progress before I indulge the hon. Gentleman.
It is important that the system...
John Healey | 464 c489-91 (Link to this contribution)
I beg to move, That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment.
The hon. Member for Bro...
Robert Neill | 464 c491-2 (Link to this contribution)
In our judgment, the other place has clearly and significantly improved the Bill in this case and I ...
Andy Slaughter | 464 c492 (Link to this contribution)
I am most grateful to the hon. Gentleman. I am pleased to see that the hon. Member for Henley (Mr. J...
Robert Neill | 464 c492-3 (Link to this contribution)
Perhaps the hon. Gentleman should have been more patient, because I was dealing first with the lack ...
Robert Neill | 464 c492 (Link to this contribution)
I give way to the hon. Gentleman who is itching to speak.
Tom Brake | 464 c493-4 (Link to this contribution)
Again, I am pleased to return to this matter, which was debated at greater length than any other in ...
John Healey | 464 c497 (Link to this contribution)
Yes—Doncaster, Watford, Hackney.
I return to the point that I was making. Out of the 25 elected Ass...
Robert Neill | 464 c507 (Link to this contribution)
I am grateful to the Minister for his introduction of the amendment. As he said, I welcome the Gover...
Robert Neill | 464 c510-1 (Link to this contribution)
We accept the Minister's sensible amendments. The principle of confirmation hearings is, I concede, ...
John Healey | 464 c482 (Link to this contribution)
No, I am simply trying to do justice to some of the arguments that were made in debates during previ...
Tom Brake | 464 c486 (Link to this contribution)
I thought that I had made it extremely clear that we are in favour of a two-term limit, but that Bar...
Robert Neill | 464 c510 (Link to this contribution)
Suffice it to say that we agree with the Minister and have nothing to add.
Lords amendment agreed t...
Clive Efford | 464 c502 (Link to this contribution)
The hon. Gentleman has spoken with a great deal of common sense in this debate, although we were on ...
Speaker | 464 c488 (Link to this contribution)
Order. Extending the debate to the outer limits of Chelmsford is one thing, but extending it across ...
David Evennett | 464 c484 (Link to this contribution)
Will my hon. Friend give way?
Subjects
Contains statistics
Yes
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-02-08 18:03:01 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_65805
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_65805
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_65805