Draft SI on Gambling (Geographical Distribution of Casino Premises Licences). Lords debate on a motion to approve. Amendment debated and agreed to on division (123 votes to 120). Original motion agreed to as amended and message sent to the Commons.
Gambling (Geographical Distribution of Casino Premises Licences) Order 2007
Debates on delegated legislation on Wednesday, 28 March 2007,
in the House of Lords,
led by Lord Davies of Oldham.
The answering
member was Lord Howard of Rising.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
690 c1658-95
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Gambling (Geographical Distribution of Casino Premises Licences) Order 2007
Thursday, 1 March 2007
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Thursday, 1 March 2007
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Merits of Statutory Instruments Committee. 13th Report on draft SI on Gambling (Geographical Distribution of Casino Premises Licences). In two volumes.
Tuesday, 13 March 2007
Parliamentary committees
House of Lords
Tuesday, 13 March 2007
Parliamentary committees
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Bishop of Southwell and Nottingham | 690 c1684-5 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, my friend the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of Manchester is unable to be in his place...
Lord Howard of Rising | 690 c1685-7 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, the gaming Bill was passed in the wash-up at the end of a Parliament and was never subject...
Show all contributions (39)
Lord McNally | 690 c1683 (Link to this contribution)
therefore, I shall say a few words on how we shall vote. We are talking to a very wise old House. I ...
Lord Faulkner of Worcester | 690 c1683 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, before the noble Lord leaves the question of the Noble Organisation, can he confirm that i...
Lord McNally | 690 c1683 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, that is true, but it is also true that the company has a planning application in under the...
Lord McNally | 690 c1680-3 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, it is a great pleasure and an honour to follow the noble Lord, Lord Blaker. Many of the th...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 690 c1687 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, we have had a very full debate, with every issue that one could conceive of on the order h...
Lord Greaves | 690 c1687 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I will explain why I have risen, if I may. There was no indication that we were proceeding...
Lord Grocott | 690 c1687 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, as ever on these occasions, a judgment has to be made on when is a sensible time for the w...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 690 c1687-9 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, as I was saying, this extensive debate has covered all the issues on the order more than a...
Lord Hoyle | 690 c1689 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, my noble friend keeps referring to the panel and that it did the job. Yet Professor Crow’s...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 690 c1689 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, Professor Crow identified that Manchester fulfilled the criteria better, which is why he r...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 690 c1689-92 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, before noble Lords say that those are more weasel words, I should say that of course I wil...
Lord Clement-Jones | 690 c1692-3 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, this has been a very good debate and I thank all noble Lords who spoke in favour of my Ame...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 690 c1662 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, the Government have moved a considerable way in proposing to accept my noble friend’s amen...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 690 c1658-61 (Link to this contribution)
rose to move, That the draft order laid before the House on 1 March be approved.
The noble Lord sai...
Lord Howard of Rising | 690 c1661 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, what the Minister is saying sounds most welcome. In saying that he will accept the amendme...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 690 c1662 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, if the noble Lord is asking this House to consider a position in which the only issue is t...
Lord McNally | 690 c1662 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, the leader of the Liberal Democrats in Blackpool, councillor Robert Wynne, and the Liberal...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 690 c1663 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, like the noble Lord, Lord McNally, the noble Lord is knowledgeable about Blackpool and I a...
Lord Blaker | 690 c1663 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, may I just clarify the position of Blackpool council? It is very much in favour of a regio...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 690 c1663 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I recognise that important point. It is also why the Secretary of State has already announ...
Lord Lee of Trafford | 690 c1663 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I am sure that the Minister will be as delighted as I am at the tremendous growth in touri...
Lord Glentoran | 690 c1663 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I know that we are becoming rather like the House at the other end, continuously interrupt...
Lord Faulkner of Worcester | 690 c1663 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I thank my noble friend for giving way—
Lord Davies of Oldham | 690 c1663 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, the Government will not vote against that amendment; they will accept it. That is what we ...
Lord Faulkner of Worcester | 690 c1663-4 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I apologise for interrupting my noble friend but further to this very important point, whi...
Lord Lipsey | 690 c1675-7 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I speak because I, together with my noble friend Lady Golding, wrote to a number Peers on ...
Lord Williams of Oystermouth | 690 c1677-9 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I have listened very carefully to the remarks made by the Minister and others about the pr...
Lord Walpole | 690 c1671-2 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, it gives me great pleasure to get to my feet here rather than going to meetings in practic...
Lord McIntosh of Haringey | 690 c1673-4 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I have four different interests to declare. None of them prevents me from speaking, but th...
Baroness Golding | 690 c1667-9 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I agree with almost every word that the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, has said. However,...
Lord Mancroft | 690 c1669-71 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, I have tabled my amendment, which is the third on the list, alongside those of the noble B...
Baroness Hayman | 690 c1664 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, before calling Amendment No. 1, I have to inform the House that if it is agreed to I canno...
Lord Clement-Jones | 690 c1664-7 (Link to this contribution)
rose to move, as an amendment to the Motion, to leave out all the words after ““that”” and insert ““...
Lord Blaker | 690 c1679-80 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, for 28 years I represented Blackpool South in the other place, and I shall refer to regene...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 690 c1664 (Link to this contribution)
My Lords, the latter would be a strange action for the Government to take. An independent panel reco...
Notes
Correction made in Lords Minute of 1 May 2007 - in the division, Baroness Warnock should have been recorded as voting Content instead of Baroness Warwick of Undercliffe.
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-11 09:41:09 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_62858
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_62858
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_62858