therefore, I shall say a few words on how we shall vote. We are talking to a very wise old House. I assure the noble Baroness, Lady Golding, that if the amendment of my noble friend Lord Clement-Jones is carried, of course the Government Whips will say, ““Apocalypse now; it’s all over. There is nothing else we can do. You’ve destroyed it all””. That is what Government Whips do. I was a member of a Government who were regularly defeated in the 1970s. However, we dusted ourselves down, looked at the new situation and came forward with a new proposal.
We need to be clear about two issues. First, does this House approve of the decision in favour of Manchester? If noble Lords do not, they should vote for the amendment of my noble friend Lord Clement-Jones. Secondly, if not Manchester, where? That is not a matter to be decided tonight but could be put before a Select Committee. That is the opportunity that the House has, and it should take it.
Gambling (Geographical Distribution of Casino Premises Licences) Order 2007
Proceeding contribution from
Lord McNally
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 28 March 2007.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Gambling (Geographical Distribution of Casino Premises Licences) Order 2007.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
690 c1683 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 11:48:30 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_388704
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_388704
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_388704