My hon. Friend is entirely right. Ducks go quack, cows go moo and Conservatives hate regulation of the market. It is part of their ingrained DNA.
More
More
More
More
More
More
More
More
Filter results
More
More
More
More
More
More
More
More
My hon. Friend is entirely right. Ducks go quack, cows go moo and Conservatives hate regulation of the market. It is part of their ingrained DNA.
It is a pleasure to follow the Father of the House and to agree with many of the sentiments he expressed.
I look at the Bill and at the Ministers and my reaction is to ask, “Is this it?” Considering what we have been through and the problems in British and...
It is a pleasure to follow the Father of the House and to agree with many of the sentiments he expressed.
I look at the Bill and at the Ministers and my reaction is to ask, “Is this it?” Considering what we have been through and the problems in British and...
My Lords, I thank the Minister for securing this debate. I also extend my congratulations to the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of Coventry on his excellent maiden speech, which I watched on the screen upstairs. I must confess that I am still reeling from Question Time and the intervention...
My Lords, I thank the Minister for securing this debate. I also extend my congratulations to the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of Coventry on his excellent maiden speech, which I watched on the screen upstairs. I must confess that I am still reeling from Question Time and the intervention...
My Lords, first, I declare an interest as a farmer. We have all received much evidence, both for and against, on this amendment. It seemed right to consider all the evidence and facts afresh, including my own knowledge of the industry, and to re-examine the case for and against abolition.
I...
My Lords, first, I declare an interest as a farmer. We have all received much evidence, both for and against, on this amendment. It seemed right to consider all the evidence and facts afresh, including my own knowledge of the industry, and to re-examine the case for and against abolition.
I...
I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Nuneaton (Mr Jones) on securing this debate. He is a big supporter of beer and pubs and it is a great pleasure to be working again with him and colleagues from across the House who support our national drink and our community...
I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Nuneaton (Mr Jones) on securing this debate. He is a big supporter of beer and pubs and it is a great pleasure to be working again with him and colleagues from across the House who support our national drink and our community...
My hon. Friend is absolutely right. In the morning rush hour more than four people stand per square metre on rail services in her constituency and across London. More than four people stand per square metre on all peak-time District line trains from Putney Bridge to Earl’s Court. The same...
My hon. Friend is absolutely right. In the morning rush hour more than four people stand per square metre on rail services in her constituency and across London. More than four people stand per square metre on all peak-time District line trains from Putney Bridge to Earl’s Court. The same...
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment his Department has made of the economic effect of the Schmallenberg virus on (a) farmers and (b) regional economies.
[139201]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment his Department has made of the economic effect of the Schmallenberg virus on (a) farmers and (b) regional economies.
[139201]
The information is not held in the format requested. Economic assessments were carried out on an epidemiological assessment completed in early 2012, looking at the potential spread of Schmallenberg virus (SBV) in GB, the impact and risk across different regions of the country. As the true impact was not known at that time, we used estimates based on other similar viruses and the UK livestock distribution.
This demonstrated that for infection in counties south of the midlands, which were determined to be at high or medium risk of SBV spread in 2011-12, if losses occurred on 5% of cattle and sheep farms and in 10% of the herd or flock, the cost to sheep farmers would be approximately £1 million, and for cattle farmers approximately £2.5 million. This is less than the economic impact of other common industry managed livestock disease such as mastitis in dairy cows, and foot rot in sheep. Widening the assessment to include counties deemed to be at low risk of infection in 2011, increased costs to farmers by about a third.
Another scenario tested was 20% of all cattle and sheep farms in the high and medium risk areas being affected. This increased costs to sheep farmers to approximately £4 million, and to cattle farmers to approximately £10 million.
Since carrying out these assessments, we now have information from the EU and our own UK farms on the impact and spread. These confirm actual impact to overall be lower than our estimates (although of course
the impact on an individual flock or herd may be substantial), and we are now looking at reviewing the economic impact to take these into account.
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what assessment he has made of the behaviour of Xfor in giving on-the-spot fines.
[142675]
To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what assessment he has made of the behaviour of Xfor in giving on-the-spot fines.
[142675]
[holding answer 11 February 2013]: My Department has not made an official assessment, but I am aware that this issue has attracted widespread public concern. I would make the following observations:
Those who harm the environment by shamelessly littering and fly-tipping should be brought to book.
However, councils should not be using residents as cash cows and should not be persecuting people for petty or insignificant breaches.
It is not in the public interest to issue a fixed penalty notice where there is not clear evidence that the individual intended to cause litter.
Enforcement action is better targeted at problem areas, rather than applied across a whole local authority area.
The issuing of fixed penalty notices or fines is a quasi-judicial matter. Commercial contracts which are based on the volume of penalties issued, or on a fixed amount of revenue to be raised, are likely to undermine public confidence in a fair judicial system and potentially undermine the quality of justice itself. Indeed, this principle is recognised in guidance to councils on parking fines: 'Performance and rewards/penalties should never be based on the number of Penalty Charge Notices, immobilisations or removals' (DFT, ‘Operational Guidance to Local Authorities: Parking Policy and Enforcement’, November 2010, para 4.12).
Where external contractors are used, ultimately, the responsibility still lies with the local authorities to ensure that legal powers are exercised fairly and reasonably and civil liberties are respected; councillors should regularly scrutinise the operation of such contracts; and the broader use of such powers must command and continue to command public support.
There are many other ways for councils to tackle litter, such as the use of warnings, education campaigns, the helpful provision of litter bins and the regular collection of rubbish bins by the local authority.
It is a great pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Gray, and I thank the hon. Member for Wansbeck (Ian Lavery) for securing the debate.
I am saddened by the comments made by the hon. Member for Linlithgow and East Falkirk (Michael Connarty), because until then we kept the debate...
It is a great pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Gray, and I thank the hon. Member for Wansbeck (Ian Lavery) for securing the debate.
I am saddened by the comments made by the hon. Member for Linlithgow and East Falkirk (Michael Connarty), because until then we kept the debate...
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what regulations his Department introduced between 1 June 2012 and 31 January 2013; and at what cost to the public purse.
[143084]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what regulations his Department introduced between 1 June 2012 and 31 January 2013; and at what cost to the public purse.
[143084]
The number of statutory instruments (Regulations and Orders) made between the 1 June 2012 and 31 January 2013 by the Department for Transport was 1,209. The instruments are available on the legislation.gov website alongside impact assessments where produced.
Of the 1,209 instruments, 1,150 were temporary in application and restricted to specific geographical areas. Most of these related to temporary road works, the rest to temporary flying restrictions, for instance in connection with air displays and the Olympic Games.
The remaining 59 are as follows:
Statutory
Instrument | IA? |
Traffic
Management (Doncaster Borough Council) Permit Scheme Order
2012 | No |
Traffic
Management (Rotherham Borough Council) Permit Scheme Order
2012 | No |
Traffic
Management (The Council of the Borough of Kirklees) Permit Scheme Order
2012 | No |
Traffic
Management (Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council) Permit Scheme Order
2012 | No |
Traffic
Management (Leeds. City Council) Permit Scheme Order
2012 | No |
Traffic
Management (Sheffield City Council) Permit Scheme Order
2012 | No |
Road
Vehicles (Individual Approval) (Fees) (Amendment) Regulations
2012 | No |
Street
Works (Charges for Occupation of the Highway) (Transport for London)
Order
2012 | No |
Driving
Instruction (Suspension and Exemption Powers) Act 2009 (Commencement
No. 1) Order
2012 | No |
Humber
Bridge Board (Membership) Order
2012 | No |
Road
Vehicles (Construction and Use) (Amendment) Regulations
2012 | No |
Community
Drivers' Hours and Recording Equipment Regulations
2012 | Yes |
Driving
Instruction (Compensation Scheme) Regulations
2012 | Yes |
Merchant
Shipping (Accident Reporting and Investigation) Regulations
2012 | Yes |
Poole
Harbour Revision Order
2012 | No |
Air
Navigation (Amendment)
Order2012 | Yes |
Merchant
Shipping and Fishing Vessels (Health and Safety at Work) (Chemical
Agents) (Amendment) Regulations
2012 | Yes |
Nene
Valley Railway (Fletton Branch) Order
2012 | No |
M62
Motorway (Junctions 25 to 30) (Actively Managed Hard Shoulder and
Variable Speed Limits) Regulations
2012 | Yes |
Hinkley
Point Harbour Empowerment Order
2012 | No |
Caernarfon
Harbour Trust (Constitution) Harbour Revision Order
2012 | No |
M25
Motorway (Junctions 7 to 16) (Variable Speed Limits) Regulations
2012 | Yes |
Street
Works (Charges for Unreasonably Prolonged Occupation of the Highway)
(England) (Amendment) Regulations
2012 | Yes |
Merchant
Shipping (Compulsory insurance of Shipowners for Maritime Claims)
Regulations
2012 | Yes |
Network
Rail (Ipswich Chord) Order
2012 | No |
A282
Trunk Road (Dartford-Thurrock Crossing Charging Scheme) Order
2012 | Yes |
Traffic
Management (Hertfordshire County Council) Permit Scheme Order
2012 | No |
Traffic
Management (Luton Borough Council) Permit Scheme Order
2012 | No |
Traffic
Management (Southend-On-Sea Borough Council) Permit Scheme Order
2012 | No |
Traffic
Management (Bedford Borough Council) Permit Scheme Order
2012 | No |
Motor
Fuel (Composition and Content) (Amendment) Regulations
2012 | No |
The
Port Security (Port of Aberdeen) Designation Order
2012 | Yes |
The
Port Security (Port of Workington) Designation Order
2012 | Yes |
The
Port Security (Port of Grangemouth) Designation Order
2012 | Yes |
The
Port Security (Port of Tees and Hartlepool) Designation Order
2012 | Yes |
The
Port Security (Port of Portland) Designation Order
2012 | Yes |
The
Network Rail (North Doncaster Chord) Order
2012 | No |
Merchant
Shipping (Passenger Ships on Domestic Voyages) (Amendment) Regulations
2012 | Yes |
Sunderland
City Council (Sunderland Strategic Transport Corridor—New Wear
Bridge) Scheme 2009 Confirmation Instrument
2012 | No |
Sunderland
City Council (Sunderland Strategic Transport Corridor—Temporary
Works New Wear Bridge) Scheme 2009 Confirmation Instrument
2012 | No |
Motor
Vehicles (Tests) (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations
2012 | Yes |
Chiltern
Railways (Bicester to Oxford Improvements) Order
2012 | No |
Energy
Act 2004 (Amendment) Regulations
2012 | No |
Bus
Lane Contraventions (Approved Local Authorities) (England) (Amendment)
and Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions Designation (No. 2)
Order
2012 | No |
A30
Trunk Road (Turks Head Link) (Trunking) Order
2012 | No |
Rehabilitation
Courses (Relevant Drink Offences) Regulations
2012 | Yes |
Road
Safety Act 2006 (Commencement No.9 and Transitional Provisions) Order
2012 | No |
Transport
for Greater Manchester (Light Rapid Transit System) (Oldham, Manchester
Street Modification) Order
2012 | No |
River
Tyne (Tunnels) (Revision of Tolls) Order
2012 | No |
Air
Navigation (Dangerous Goods) (Amendment) Regulations
2012 | No |
Motor
Fuel (Road Vehicle and Mobile Machinery) Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Reporting Regulations
2012 | Yes |
Cowes
Harbour Revision Order
2012 | No |
Traffic
Management (London Borough of Sutton) Permit Scheme Order
2012 | No |
Traffic
Management (London Borough of Merton) Permit Scheme Order
2012 | No |
Traffic
Management (London Borough of Tower Hamlets) Permit Scheme Order
2012 | No |
Severn
Bridges Tolls Order
2012 | No |
Port
of Ipswich Harbour Revision Order
2012 | No |
Merchant
Shipping (Carriage of Passengers by Sea) Regulations
2012 | Yes |
Driving
Licences (Exchangeable Licences) (Amendment) Order
2013 | No |
Government policy does not require an impact assessment to be prepared for an instrument, unless there are also costs or savings to businesses or civil society organisations. Information about costs to the public purse where there is no impact assessment could be provided only at disproportionate cost. This is because of the level of analysis that would be required to answer the question.
Links to the IA published in the IA library are included for the impact assessments produced over the period, which estimate the costs of each measure, including those to the public purse.
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) what discussions he has had with the Scottish Government to assess the potential effect on milk supplies of the reduction in the options for control of flukicides;
[143007]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) what discussions he has had with the Scottish Government to assess the potential effect on milk supplies of the reduction in the options for control of flukicides;
[143007]
[holding answer 12 February 2013]: The Veterinary Medicines Directorate regularly engages with the Scottish Government on Veterinary Medicines issues.
The decision to change the labelling on veterinary medicines containing certain flukicides to contra-indicate their use in lactating cows was made at the European level. The European Commission's series of implementing regulations permit the establishment of maximum residue limits (MRLs) in milk and will ensure the safety of milk and milk products from treated dairy cattle for consumers. As a result of the recently established MRLs for some flukicides, the Veterinary Medicines Directorate is encouraging manufacturers of these veterinary medicinal products authorised for use in the UK to apply for milk withdrawal periods by submitting residue depletion studies.
The availability of veterinary medicines is controlled by European law, and the Veterinary Medicines Directorate, as the Competent Authority for the United Kingdom, has contributed to the discussions held by European
Medicines Agency Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use. This issue affects dairy producers in all member states including the whole of the United Kingdom.
Advice on alternative veterinary medicinal products is available on request from the Veterinary Medicines Directorate.
(2) what discussions he has had with the Scottish Government on the European Commission's implementing regulations allowing for the establishment of maximum residue levels for milk in respect of the majority of flukicides.
[143009]
Cathy Jamieson:
(2) what discussions he has had with the Scottish Government on the European Commission's implementing regulations allowing for the establishment of maximum residue levels for milk in respect of the majority of flukicides.
[143009]
Cathy Jamieson:
[holding answer 12 February 2013]: The Veterinary Medicines Directorate regularly engages with the Scottish Government on Veterinary Medicines issues.
The decision to change the labelling on veterinary medicines containing certain flukicides to contra-indicate their use in lactating cows was made at the European level. The European Commission's series of implementing regulations permit the establishment of maximum residue limits (MRLs) in milk and will ensure the safety of milk and milk products from treated dairy cattle for consumers. As a result of the recently established MRLs for some flukicides, the Veterinary Medicines Directorate is encouraging manufacturers of these veterinary medicinal products authorised for use in the UK to apply for milk withdrawal periods by submitting residue depletion studies.
The availability of veterinary medicines is controlled by European law, and the Veterinary Medicines Directorate, as the Competent Authority for the United Kingdom, has contributed to the discussions held by European
Medicines Agency Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use. This issue affects dairy producers in all member states including the whole of the United Kingdom.
Advice on alternative veterinary medicinal products is available on request from the Veterinary Medicines Directorate.
I am happy for the record to be put straight on that; in the heat of the debate, I made a slip of the tongue. I am the granddaughter of a cattle farmer in Northern Ireland, so it is incumbent on me to recommend the meat of the good cows...
I am happy for the record to be put straight on that; in the heat of the debate, I made a slip of the tongue. I am the granddaughter of a cattle farmer in Northern Ireland, so it is incumbent on me to recommend the meat of the good cows...
My hon. Friend is making a powerful point. The consequence of driving down costs has been to drive down quality as well. Is it not invidious that some products being sold as beef have never come into contact with a cow?
My hon. Friend is making a powerful point. The consequence of driving down costs has been to drive down quality as well. Is it not invidious that some products being sold as beef have never come into contact with a cow?
I congratulate the shadow DEFRA Front-Bench team on pursuing this issue relentlessly and on choosing it as a topic for
today’s debate. We had a statement yesterday, but there is a lot more to be thrashed out on this issue. I therefore greatly welcome the opportunity to take part in...
I congratulate the shadow DEFRA Front-Bench team on pursuing this issue relentlessly and on choosing it as a topic for
today’s debate. We had a statement yesterday, but there is a lot more to be thrashed out on this issue. I therefore greatly welcome the opportunity to take part in...
Exactly. I raised that very issue with the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs yesterday, and I have to say from his response that it looked as if it was the first he had heard of it; he simply said that we rely on scientific advice, which...
Exactly. I raised that very issue with the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs yesterday, and I have to say from his response that it looked as if it was the first he had heard of it; he simply said that we rely on scientific advice, which...
I am astounded that the Secretary of State thinks that this is a mis-labelling issue, given that some beef products have not even come into contact with a cow—except perhaps sharing a field with one at some time. I am appalled when he says that there is not even a...
I am astounded that the Secretary of State thinks that this is a mis-labelling issue, given that some beef products have not even come into contact with a cow—except perhaps sharing a field with one at some time. I am appalled when he says that there is not even a...
It is going to happen, and my lawnmower is out in force already. Media lawyers from across the industry are working flat out to establish a scheme that will be good for the public but not an intolerable burden on the regional press in particular. Crucially, we have to find...
It is going to happen, and my lawnmower is out in force already. Media lawyers from across the industry are working flat out to establish a scheme that will be good for the public but not an intolerable burden on the regional press in particular. Crucially, we have to find...
My Lords, it is a joy and a pleasure to take part in this debate; I am delighted. We must of course remember that almost everything that could be said has been said, but not by everybody. I have some evidence to produce, which may be new but I do...
My Lords, it is a joy and a pleasure to take part in this debate; I am delighted. We must of course remember that almost everything that could be said has been said, but not by everybody. I have some evidence to produce, which may be new but I do...
It is not uncommon in inexpensive burgers, for example, to use bulking material such as beef protein, and it is not illegal to do so. The EU labelling regime changes to which the hon. Member for Ogmore referred will require such material to be more specifically labelled in future. I...
It is not uncommon in inexpensive burgers, for example, to use bulking material such as beef protein, and it is not illegal to do so. The EU labelling regime changes to which the hon. Member for Ogmore referred will require such material to be more specifically labelled in future. I...
Showing results 1341 - 1360 of 3,227 in 3.18 seconds.