Asked by
Lord Stratford
(Labour)
What was the cost to his Department of the use of the Royal Yacht at Cowes between 28th July and 2nd August 1995; and what use was made of her during this period.
Date
More
Session
More
Department
More
Member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Primary member
More
Filter results
Date
More
Session
More
Department
More
Member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Primary member
More
3,221 results
What was the cost to his Department of the use of the Royal Yacht at Cowes between 28th July and 2nd August 1995; and what use was made of her during this period.
Answered by
Lord Soames of Fletching
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written question
Status
Answered
For answer on
8 February 1996
Answered on
8 February 1996
Subjects
Costs; Festivals and special occasion; HMY Britannia; Operating costs
Date
8 February 1996
Reference
14155; 271 c359W
House
House of Commons
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_217816
What was the cost to his Department for the presence of the Royal Yacht `Britannia' at this year's Cowes Regatta. - Ref to 257 c1151. Information on the marginal costs of individual deployments could not be provided without disproportionate cost.
What was the cost to his Department for the presence of the Royal Yacht `Britannia' at this year's Cowes Regatta. - Ref to 257 c1151. Information on the marginal costs of individual deployments could not be provided without disproportionate cost.
Asked by
Lord Stratford
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Soames of Fletching
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written question
Status
Answered
For answer on
6 February 1996
Answered on
6 February 1996
Subjects
Costs; Festivals and special occasion; HMY Britannia; Operating costs
Date
6 February 1996
Reference
5310; 271 c167W
House
House of Commons
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_217231
If he will publish in pounds sterling and ECU's, the EC expenditure on the dairy regime in the latest year for which figures are available in each member state showing the average support per cow in each state and the European average. - Table given.
If he will publish in pounds sterling and ECU's, the EC expenditure on the dairy regime in the latest year for which figures are available in each member state showing the average support per cow in each state and the European average. - Table given.
Asked by
Roger Moate
(Conservative)
Answered by
Tony Baldry
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food
Type
Written question
Status
Answered
For answer on
30 January 1996
Answered on
30 January 1996
Subjects
Dairy farming; Expenditure; Common agricultural policy
Date
30 January 1996
Reference
10673; 270 c693-4W
House
House of Commons
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_216374
When the practice of applying organophosphorus insecticides to the backs of cows began.
When the practice of applying organophosphorus insecticides to the backs of cows began.
Asked by
Lord McNair
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Lord Lucas
(Conservative)
Type
Written question
Status
Answered
For answer on
23 January 1996
Answered on
23 January 1996
Subjects
Cattle; Disease; Disease control; Organophosphates; Warble fly
Date
23 January 1996
Reference
568 c68WA
House
House of Lords
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_462911
What action his Department has taken to trace the previous owners of the herd of cattle containing confirmed BSE cases at Old Hall Farm, Gargrave; if he will list the names and addresses of the owners; and if he will indicate the date of birth and death of each cow....
What action his Department has taken to trace the previous owners of the herd of cattle containing confirmed BSE cases at Old Hall Farm, Gargrave; if he will list the names and addresses of the owners; and if he will indicate the date of birth and death of each cow....
Asked by
David Hinchliffe
(Labour)
Answered by
Baroness Browning
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food
Type
Written question
Status
Answered
For answer on
19 January 1996
Answered on
19 January 1996
Mr. Hinchliffe: To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what action his Department has taken to trace the previous
owners of the herd of cattle containing confirmed BSE cases at Old Hall farm, Gargrave, if he will list the names and addresses of
the owners; and if he will indicate the date of birth and death of each cow. [10445]
Mrs. Browning: When a case of BSE is detected in an animal on a dealer's premises, MAFF makes every effort possible to trace the
vendor of the animal and then confirms BSE on the vendor's premises. The detailed information requested would, however be available
only at disproportionate cost.
Subjects
Cattle; Disease; Farm; Disease control; BSE; Gargrave
Date
19 January 1996
Reference
10445; 269 c788-9W;269 c786-7W
House
House of Commons
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_458398
That an humble Address be presented to Her Majesty, praying that the Sheep Annual Premium and Suckler Cow Premium Quotas (Re-assessment of Eligibility) Regulations 1996 (S.I., 1996, No. 48), dated 10th January 1996, a copy of which was laid before this House on 15th January, be annulled.
That an humble Address be presented to Her Majesty, praying that the Sheep Annual Premium and Suckler Cow Premium Quotas (Re-assessment of Eligibility) Regulations 1996 (S.I., 1996, No. 48), dated 10th January 1996, a copy of which was laid before this House on 15th January, be annulled.
Primary sponsor
Tony Blair
(Labour)
Type
Fatal prayer
Date
17 January 1996
Reference
296
House
House of Commons
http://data.parliament.uk/edms/13075
Pursuant to his Answer of 14th December to the honourable Member for Pendle, how many of the bovines in which BSE was confirmed were from (a) England, (b) Wales, (c) Scotland and (d) Northern Ireland; and of the carcases, how many from each country were (i) cows, (ii) maiden heifers,...
Pursuant to his Answer of 14th December to the honourable Member for Pendle, how many of the bovines in which BSE was confirmed were from (a) England, (b) Wales, (c) Scotland and (d) Northern Ireland; and of the carcases, how many from each country were (i) cows, (ii) maiden heifers,...
Asked by
William Ross
(Ulster Unionist Party)
Answered by
Baroness Browning
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food
Type
Written question
Status
Answered
For answer on
15 January 1996
Answered on
15 January 1996
Mr. William Ross: To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, pursuant to his answer of 14 December to the hon. Member
for Pendle (Mr. Prentice), how many of the bovines in which BSE was confirmed were from (a) England, (b) Wales, (c) Scotland and (c)
Northern Ireland; and of the carcases, how many from each country were (i) cows, (ii) maiden heifers, (iii) steers and (iv) bulls.
[7138]
Mrs. Browning: In his reply of 14 December to the hon. Member for Pendle (Mr. Prentice) Official Report,
column 1094, my right hon. Friend the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food gave the number of cases of BSE confirmed in the
United Kingdom up to 8 December 1995 as 155,832. This was incorrect as the information given was for Great Britain and not the
United Kingdom. The number of cases which has been confirmed in the United Kingdom at that date was 157,480.
Up to 15 December 1995, 157,767 cases of BSE had been confirmed in the United Kingdom, and of these 133,849 were confirmed in
England, 7,508 in Scotland, 14,757 in Wales, and 1,653 in Northern Ireland.
Details of confirmed BSE cases are not recorded in a manner which permits retrieval in the format requested with respect to sex of
the affected animal. For Great Britain and Northern Ireland, up to 15 December 1995, the available data can be broken down as
follows:
Number of BSE cases
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Great Britain Northern Ireland
Cows 155,656 1,651
Steers 23 0
Bulls 435 2
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Subjects
Cattle; Diseases; BSE
Date
15 January 1996
Reference
7138; 269 c443-4W;269 c441-2W
House
House of Commons
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_458768
Statement on plans to re-assess producers' entitlement to developers quota from the 1993 sheep annual premium and suckler cow premium quota national reserves following the judgement of Mr Justice Macpherson in the English High Court on 22nd June 1995; and what provision he is making to compensate producers adversely affected...
Statement on plans to re-assess producers' entitlement to developers quota from the 1993 sheep annual premium and suckler cow premium quota national reserves following the judgement of Mr Justice Macpherson in the English High Court on 22nd June 1995; and what provision he is making to compensate producers adversely affected...
Asked by
David Shaw
(Conservative)
Answered by
Viscount Hailsham
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food
Type
Written question
Status
Answered
For answer on
15 January 1996
Answered on
15 January 1996
Mr. David Shaw: To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what plans he has to re-assess producers' entitlement to
developers' quota from the 1993 sheep annual premium and suckler cow premium quota national reserves following the judgment of Mr.
Justice Macpherson in the English High Court on 22 June 1995; and what provision he is making to compensate producers adversely
affected by his Department's actions. [9708]
Mr. Douglas Hogg: We have today laid before Parliament the Sheep Annual Premium and Suckler Cow Premium Quota (Re-assessment of
Eligibility) Regulations 1996. These regulations put in place arrangements for the re-assessment, in England, Wales, Scotland and
Northern Ireland, of applications for "developers" quota from a special reserve using new guidelines governing eligibility. The
farming and landowning organisations have been fully consulted on the purpose and content of the regulations.
Where these arrangements adversely affect producers they will be entitled to compensation. The general principles forming the basis
of compensation as currently envisaged are as follows: 1. Producers whose applications for `developers' quota are newly assessed as
eligible will be entitled to: either
if they acquired quota by transfer or lease for any or all of the scheme years 1993 to 1996 for SAPS and 1993 to 1995 for SCPS
reimbursement of the cost of acquiring that quota up to a maximum of the amount of quota that they should have received under
category 3c; or
if they did not acquire quota by transfer or lease for all or any of the scheme years 1993 to 1995 and can demonstrate that the
eligible animals that would have been covered by that quota were retained on the holding during the relevant retention periods,
reimbursement of the value of the premium they would have received on the eligible animals during 1993 to 1995 up to a maximum of
the amount of quota that they should have received under category 3c; and
where appropriate, an award of quota in accordance with the Regulations. 2. Those individuals (or their personal representatives)
who are unable to apply for quota from the special reserve but who would have been entitled to receive "developers" quota from the
1993 national reserve had the new eligibility guidelines been used originally: will be entitled to compensation equivalent to that
in paragraph 1. 3. Where producers who have quota withdrawn from them to meet the new demand for "developers" quota: they will be
entitled to a compensation payment with which they can, if they wish, purchase quota through the open market to replace that
withdrawn, and their entitlement to 1996 SAPS payments in respect of any withdrawn quota will be honoured provided that the
producers concerned meet the Scheme rules 4. Other producers
Where producers consider that compensation not provided for in paragraphs 1 to 3 above is due to them as a result of the
re-assessment exercise, they will be able to submit details of their case for consideration by the appropriate Agriculture
Department. 5. Practical arrangements
In most cases it will be possible only to determine those who may be eligible for compensation and the amounts due once all
applications have been assessed, the final demand for quota has been established and quota has been allocated. This will not be
before the summer of 1996.
The aim is to draw up standard terms for compensation--which will be agreed with farming and landowning organisations--which will
simplify the process for claiming compensation for most farmers.
Legislation
Sheep Annual Premium and Suckler Cow Premium Quotas (Re-assessment of Eligibility) Regulations 1996
Subjects
Agriculture; Cattle; Sheep; Subsidy; Suckler cow premium; Sheep premiums; Statutory instruments
Date
15 January 1996
Reference
9708; 269 c462-3W;269 c460-1W
House
House of Commons
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_459024
If he will list (a) the amount of grants to NGOs from the ODA and (b) the amount of UK aid money disbursed through NGOs in the last year for which figures are available. - Inc tables.
If he will list (a) the amount of grants to NGOs from the ODA and (b) the amount of UK aid money disbursed through NGOs in the last year for which figures are available. - Inc tables.
Asked by
Baroness Lestor of Eccles
(Labour)
Answered by
Jeremy Hanley
(Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written question
Status
Answered
For answer on
15 January 1996
Answered on
15 January 1996
Miss Lestor: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list (a) the amount of grants to NGOs
from the ODA and (b) the amount of UK aid money disbursed through NGOs in the last year for which figures are available. [8946]
Mr. Hanley: All expenditure from the ODA to non-governmental organisations, NGOs, is provided on a grant basis. The sum of all
grants for 1994-95 made by the Overseas Development Administration to United Kingdom NGOs for work in developing countries was
£173,124,136, as detailed in the table. The comparable figure in 1992-93 was £141,791,127, in 1993-94 it was £148,610,155.
In addition, we made grants to United Kingdom NGOs for work in eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union-- in 1994-95 amounting to
£11,989,655. The comparable figure in 1992-93 was £5,634,899; in 1993-94 it was £9,839,600.
United Kingdom NGOs also draw substantially on European Community aid programmes to which we contribute.
The table provides details of all ODA grants in 1994-95.
1994-95 Direct grants to United Kingdom Non-governmental Organisations {1}(excluding Eastern Europe)
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Voluntary Organisation Amount of direct grant awarded in financial year {2}1994-95
ACORD 2,282,748
Action Disability and Development 137,290
Action Health 2000 51,382
Action Aid 2,945,706
Afghan Aid 1,150,000
Africa Now 147,691
Africa Resource Trust 100,000
Africa Soc Int and Com Law 23,750
Aro-Asian Jour of Nematology 180
Aga Khan Foundation 978,577
AHRTAG 414,697
AMAR Appeal 85,000
AMREF 398,535
APTT Trust UK 7,836
Association for Better Land Husbandry 167,684
Association of Pioneer Rescue Officers 114,000
Associated Country Women World 13,891
Association of Commonwealth University 2,490,462
Bernt Carlsson Trust 116,000
Birdlife International 189,273
Britain Afghanistan Trust 54,000
Britain Nepal Medical Trust 90,414
British Direct Aid (UK) 228,577
British Executive Service Overseas 754,699
British Red Cross Society 17,690,732
British Refugee Council 10,000
British Society Pop Studies 3,145
Business in the Community 5,000
Busoga Trust 98,715
CAFOD 7,803,959
Calcutta Rescue Fund 1,737
Calcutta Tercentenary Trust 10,849
Cambodia Trust 79,134
Canon Collins Education Trust SA 17,037
Canterbury Christ Church IPO 87,039
CARE 10,988,910
Care for the Wild 50,000
Catholic Inst International Relations 1,952,813
Charities Aid Foundation 18,366
Charities Evaluation Services 19,396
Childhope 112,331
Christian Aid 7,542,606
Christian Children's Fund (GB) 125,754
Christian Engineers in Development 24,690
Christian Outreach 294,168
Christians Abroad 180,747
Church Missionary Society 20,902
Co-op For Development 176,115
CODA International Training 178,960
Commonwealth Human Ecology 58,762
Commonwealth TUC 113,492
Concern Universal 60,777
Concern Worldwide 3,319,941
Conservation Foundation 9,189
Cranfield Institute of Technology 44,055
Cusichaca Project Trust 23,668
Durham-Lesotho Link 20,913
Earthwatch Europe 3,091
Education for Development 1,180
Education Partners Overseas 58,753
FARM 516,572
Feed the Children 341,145
Feed the Minds 23,686
Find Your Feet 9,100
Food for Hungry International 449,152
Friends of Urambo and Mwanhala 8,626
Friends of ASSEFA 38,197
Friends of Conservation 27,468
GOAL 1,291,949
Gordon Barclay Vietnam Fund 7,663
Gurkha Welfare Trust 296,233
HALO Trust 1,912,561
Harvest Help 30,439
Health Aid Moyo 55,999
Health Aid-UK 66,840
Health Projects Abroad 49,724
Health Unlimited 703,958
Hedley Roberts Trust 2,804
Help International 98,105
HelpAge International 298,148
Help The Aged 286,906
Holy Trinity Church Middlesex 13,000
Ideas Aid International UK 20,000
Impact Foundation 25,355
India Development Group 85,750
Institute of Development Studies 3,171,052
Institute of Data Processing Management 471
Institute for Animal Health 93,396
International Year of Shelter 192,948
Intermediate Technology Development 3,809,370
International Bee Research Association 22,652
International Cent Agroforestry 100,000
International Childcare Trust 59,978
International Children's Trust 11,619
International Christian Relief 54,166
International Family Health 42,074
International Health Exchange 31,798
International Refugee Trust 34,750
International Rescue Corps 3,672
International Extension College 151,372
International HIV/AIDS Alliance 216,400
INTRAC 60,429
IPPF 9,135,018
Islamic Relief 59,946
Joint Mission Hospital Equipment Board 471,563
John Innes Institute 27,075
Kerala Federation for the Blind 6,072
King Mehendra Trust 78,368
Kurdish Cultural Society 10,040
Lasallian Projects 7,504
Legal Assistance Trust 60,000
Leonard Cheshire Foundation 55,012
Leprosy Mission 9,988
Leprosy Mission (Scotland) 23,760
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine 1,794,324
Living Earth 169,595
Marie Stopes International 2,018,930
Marlborough Brandt Group 72
Medecins Sans Frontieres 1,382,823
Medical Aid for Iraq 280,000
Medical Aid for Palestinians 340,908
Medical Emergency Relief International 1,253,902
Medical Research Council 1,812,906
Methodist Church Overseas 2,264
Mines Advisory Group 1,038,944
Money for Madagascar 10,625
Nairobi Hospice Charitable Trust 35,821
National Children's Homes 9,400
New Economics Foundation 15,685
New Hope Rural Community Trust 2,956
Ockenden Venture 150,341
One World Action 80,225
One World Broadcasting Trust 44,000
Opportunity Trust 78,453
Overseas Development Institute (ODI) 2,040,608
OXFAM 13,838,676
Pattaya Orphanage Trust 18,110
Plan International 1,616,591
Plunkett Foundation 64,541
Population Concern 543,016
Project Ploughshare 39,999
Project Rehab Malawi 1,741
Prospect Burma 11,400
Red R 56,950
Refugee Council 8,892
Richmond Fellowship International 6,640
Rio Maza 14,742
RNIB 315
Royal Agricultural Society 4,537
Royal Botanic Gardens Kew 44,739
Royal Commonwealth Society 186,576
Ryder Cheshire Mission 82,000
South Africa Townships Health Fund 66,000
Salvation Army 82,010
Save The Children Fund 20,529,172
Scottish Catholic International Aid Fund 158,401
Scottish Crop Research Institute 60,685
Scottish Development Education Centre 7,250
Scottish Education Action for Development 30,002
Scottish Natural Heritage 9,954
Send A Cow 29,300
Sid-Vale Africa Link 1,415
Silsoe College 15,298
Silsoe Research Institute 593,185
Skillshare Africa 1,584,120
SOS Sahel International 777,156
Southeast Asian Outreach 84,959
TACADE 23,482
Tear Fund 857,474
Thomson Foundation 28,181
Tools for Self Reliance 14,790
Traidcraft Exchange 451,504
Trax Programme Support 27,579
Tropical Health and Education Trust 64,949
Uganda Society for Disabled Children 104,703
UK Committee for UNICEF 2,910,287
UK Found for the Peoples of the South Pacific 225,963
UKJAID 2,475
United Nations Association Int Service 909,885
University of Warwick 27,104
VetAid 98,480
Village Service Trust 10,870
Vision Aid Overseas 29,737
Voluntary Service Overseas 18,208,167
War on Want 71,906
WaterAid 902,342
Wells for India 21,592
Womenkind 113,340
World Conservation Monitoring 67,163
World Conservation Union 37,563
World University Service 765,931
World Vision of Britain 2,371,522
World Wildlife Fund 2,100,774
Y-Care International 415,318
YES International 91,470
You and Me 32,700
Youth With A Mission 17,140
Zimbabwe Trust 61,600
Zoological Society of London 32,000
Totals 173,124,136
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
{1} Organisations registered as a charity with the Charity Commissioners in England or the Inland Revenue in Scotland.
{2} This represents expenditure channelled through NGOs for their own programmes and for development activities and emergency relief
work undertaken on behalf of the Overseas Development Administration. It includes some research work where this is implemented by
institutions which are within the definition of NGO given above.
1994-95 Direct payments to non-governmental organisations for work in eastern Europe
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Voluntary organisation Amount of direct grant awarded in financial year 1994-95
ADRA 27,700
Aga Khan Foundation 1,190,000
BEARR Trust 9,780
Bosnia Aid Comm of Oxford 50,000
Brit Helsinki Human Rights Group 1,557
British Institute International and Comparative Law 191,637
British Association of Central Eastern Europe 4,167
British Executive Service 397,558
British Hungarian Association 20,000
British Red Cross Society 1,825,270
CARE 190,180
Charities Aid Foundation 808,086
Charities Evaluation Services 15,823
Christian Aid 75,000
Elam Ministries 262,000
Fauna and Flora Preservation Society 2,200
Feed the Children 718,430
Help International 70,000
Institute of Development Studies 530
Inter Action 45,000
International Waterfowl and Wetland Res 10,724
IPPF 59,861
Joint Mission Hospital Equipment Board 60,207
Marie Stopes International 567,700
Medecins Sans Frontieres 236,511
Medical Emergency Relief International 307,792
National Institute Agricultural Botany 143,265
National Trust 1,014
Ockenden Venture 34,000
OXFAM 1,102,500
Plunkett Foundation 367,812
Prison Reform International 9,453
Royal Agricultural College 26,435
Russian European Trust 8,656
Save The Children Fund 362,296
Scottish Agricultural College 301,627
Scottish Books for Romania 3,000
Scottish European Aid 213,700
Scottish Vocational Education Council 23,454
Silsoe Research Institute 35,811
Task Force Albania 25,200
Tear Fund 120,000
Thomson Foundation 311,958
UK Committee for UNICEF 1,100,000
University of Warwick 1,051
Voluntary Service Overseas 283,000
Warchild 97,000
Westminster Foundation for Democracy 16,729
World Conservation Monitoring 33,072
World Vision of Britain 200,000
World Wildlife Fund 2,600
YES International 18,309
Totals 11,989,655
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Subjects
Central government; Development aid; Grant; Voluntary organisation; Overseas Development Administration; Non-governmental organisations
Date
15 January 1996
Reference
269 c358-63W;269 c357-62W; 8946
House
House of Commons
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_458705
SI 1996/48 (Negative Instrument). Coming into force 5 February 1996.
SI 1996/48 (Negative Instrument). Coming into force 5 February 1996.
Type
Statutory instruments
Laid on
15 January 1996
Made on
10 January 1996
Legislation
European Communities Act 1972; Sheep Annual Premium and Suckler Cow Premium Quotas (Re-assessment of Eligibility) Regulations 1996
Subjects
Agriculture; Cattle; EU law; Sheep; Subsidy; Suckler cow premiums; Sheep premiums
Commons Library location
UP 334 1995/96
Date
15 January 1996
Reference
SI 1996/48
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/StatutoryInstrument/15264
Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy. House of Commons Library Research Paper 95/132.
Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy. House of Commons Library Research Paper 95/132.
By
Christopher Barclay; Christopher Barclay
Type
Commons Briefing paper
Subjects
Agriculture; Cattle; Disease; Disease control; Medicine; Research; BSE; CJD; Transmissible encephalopathies
Date
20 December 1995
Reference
RP95-132
http://data.parliament.uk/resources/337220
What considerations underlay the conclusions of the Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee that unimportant amounts of infectivity would be found in (a) the liver, (b) the lung, (c) the kidney and (d) the peripheral nerves of the cows; and if he will comment on research findings available to the Committee on...
What considerations underlay the conclusions of the Spongiform Encephalopathy Advisory Committee that unimportant amounts of infectivity would be found in (a) the liver, (b) the lung, (c) the kidney and (d) the peripheral nerves of the cows; and if he will comment on research findings available to the Committee on...
Asked by
David Hinchliffe
(Labour)
Answered by
Baroness Browning
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food
Type
Written question
Status
Answered
For answer on
19 December 1995
Answered on
19 December 1995
Subjects
Cattle; Disease; Disease control; Offal; BSE
Date
19 December 1995
Reference
268 c1128-9W;268 c1126W; 7018;6967
House
House of Commons
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_304713
What assessment he has made of the adequacy of the murine test in respect of its sensitivity towards infectivity of the various tissues of an infected cow. - (Holding answer 18 December 1995).
What assessment he has made of the adequacy of the murine test in respect of its sensitivity towards infectivity of the various tissues of an infected cow. - (Holding answer 18 December 1995).
Asked by
David Hinchliffe
(Labour)
Answered by
Baroness Browning
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food
Type
Written question
Status
Answered
For answer on
19 December 1995
Answered on
19 December 1995
Subjects
Cattle; Disease; Research; BSE
Date
19 December 1995
Reference
6972; 268 c1126-7W;268 c1124-5W
House
House of Commons
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_304703
What experiments his Department has funded into the transmission of bovine spongiform encephalopathy from cow to offspring. - Inc ref to progress report on BSE (Dep/3 1701) and cohort study in the latest edition of the progress report (in Library). (Holding answer 18 December 1995).
What experiments his Department has funded into the transmission of bovine spongiform encephalopathy from cow to offspring. - Inc ref to progress report on BSE (Dep/3 1701) and cohort study in the latest edition of the progress report (in Library). (Holding answer 18 December 1995).
Asked by
David Hinchliffe
(Labour)
Answered by
Baroness Browning
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food
Type
Written question
Status
Answered
For answer on
19 December 1995
Answered on
19 December 1995
Subjects
Cattle; Disease; Research; BSE
Date
19 December 1995
Reference
6961; 268 c1129W;268 c1127W
House
House of Commons
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_304717
If he will list the names and manufacturers of the pesticides licensed for the treatment of British cows. - List given.
If he will list the names and manufacturers of the pesticides licensed for the treatment of British cows. - List given.
Asked by
Martin Redmond
(Labour)
Answered by
Baroness Browning
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food
Type
Written question
Status
Answered
For answer on
19 December 1995
Answered on
19 December 1995
Subjects
Cattle; Drug; Pesticides; Veterinary medicine
Date
19 December 1995
Reference
6069; 268 c1131-3W;268 c1129-31W
House
House of Commons
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_304654
Supplementary on arts exhibition of cows and sheep's intestines.
Supplementary on arts exhibition of cows and sheep's intestines.
Asked by
Lord Mowbray and Stourton
(Conservative)
Oral question - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
5 December 1995
Date
5 December 1995
Reference
567 c890
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_261426/-question
How much money was spent on (a) hill livestock compensatory allowances, (b) suckler cow premiums, (c) sheep annual premiums and (d) beef special premiums in each country of the United Kingdom in 1994-95. - Inc figures. (Holding answer 30 November 1995).
How much money was spent on (a) hill livestock compensatory allowances, (b) suckler cow premiums, (c) sheep annual premiums and (d) beef special premiums in each country of the United Kingdom in 1994-95. - Inc figures. (Holding answer 30 November 1995).
Asked by
Gavin Strang
(Labour)
Answered by
Viscount Hailsham
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food
Type
Written question
Status
Answered
For answer on
4 December 1995
Answered on
4 December 1995
Subjects
Agriculture; Expenditure; Subsidy; Hill livestock allowance; Suckler cow premium; Beef premiums; Sheep premiums
Date
4 December 1995
Reference
3221; 268 c55W
House
House of Commons
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_302002
How much money will be spent on (a) hill livestock compensatory allowances, (b) suckler cow premiums, (c) sheep annual premiums and (d) beef special premiums in each country of the United Kingdom in 1995-96. - Inc figures. (Holding answer 30 November 1995).
How much money will be spent on (a) hill livestock compensatory allowances, (b) suckler cow premiums, (c) sheep annual premiums and (d) beef special premiums in each country of the United Kingdom in 1995-96. - Inc figures. (Holding answer 30 November 1995).
Asked by
Gavin Strang
(Labour)
Answered by
Viscount Hailsham
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food
Type
Written question
Status
Answered
For answer on
4 December 1995
Answered on
4 December 1995
Subjects
Agriculture; Finance; Subsidy; Hill livestock allowance; Suckler cow premium; Beef premiums; Sheep premiums
Date
4 December 1995
Reference
3222; 268 c55W
House
House of Commons
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_302003
What research his Department has (a) evaluated and (b) commissioned into the effect of cow's milk on the health of those who are intolerant to it; what consideration he has given to making lactolite available via the National Health Service; and what inter-departmental discussions have been held about the extension...
What research his Department has (a) evaluated and (b) commissioned into the effect of cow's milk on the health of those who are intolerant to it; what consideration he has given to making lactolite available via the National Health Service; and what inter-departmental discussions have been held about the extension...
Asked by
Lord Alton of Liverpool
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Tom Sackville
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written question
Status
Answered
For answer on
27 November 1995
Answered on
27 November 1995
Subjects
Milk; Allergies
Date
27 November 1995
Reference
2003; 267 c519W;267 c517W
House
House of Commons
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_301016
That this House supports the all-party initiatives of councils and the campaign group which has been established to fight for free soya-milk tokens for people receiving income support; believes that is is inherently unfair that the Department of Health welfare food scheme permits the exchange of tokens for four litres or seven pints of cow's milk for families receiving income support who have children under the age of five years, but fails to provide the same opportunity to exchange tokens for soya milk; recognises that for some children, particularly those with allergies to cow's milk, soya milk provides the only possible alternative for bottle feeding and that poorer families should not be denied access to soya milk because of unnecessarily restrictive regulations; and therefore urges the Department of Health and the Department of Agriculture to make the necessary changes to allow families to have access to soya milk.
That this House supports the all-party initiatives of councils and the campaign group which has been established to fight for free soya-milk tokens for people receiving income support; believes that is is inherently unfair that the Department of Health welfare food scheme permits the exchange of tokens for four litres...
Primary sponsor
Lord Alton of Liverpool
(Liberal Democrat)
Type
Early day motion
Subjects
Drinks; Welfare foods; Soya beans
Date
17 November 1995
Reference
57
House
House of Commons
http://data.parliament.uk/edms/13375
Showing results 2761 - 2780 of 3,221 in 2.32 seconds.