The only real justification the Minister offered for Parliament retaining this degree of control is the possibility that the Greater London Authority and TfL might want to ban pedicabs altogether. What is his evidence that there is even the slightest possibility of this on the horizon? The present mayor has no intention of doing that—he wants them properly regulated—so is the Minister saying that the Conservative candidate for the mayoral election next year will come out for banning pedicabs altogether? What is the justification for retaining this power? Remember: all this stuff about Parliament retaining the power is nonsense. We know that we have very little control over what happens and over the content of statutory instruments, although we debate them. The power rests with the Minister and the department. Why on earth should the overworked Department for Transport want to spend its time messing around with the detail of whether pedicabs have mirrors and what the level of fines on them should be?
Pedicabs (London) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Liddle
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 11 December 2023.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Pedicabs (London) Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
834 c215GC 
Session
2023-24
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-01-10 15:23:13 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-12-11/23121135000038
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-12-11/23121135000038
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2023-12-11/23121135000038