My Lords, from these Benches we have relatively little to add. I strongly support what the noble Baroness, Lady Chakrabarti, said on various issues, not least about academic excellence because it is not just about academic freedom. Part of the purpose of a university is about educating and engaging in debate, but we are also trying to ensure that the minds of students are being stimulated. It is not just about academic freedom but that is part of it. As the noble and learned Lord, Lord Hope of Craighead, has said, Amendment 31 seems somewhat unnecessary. While on these Benches we support the amendments in the names of the noble Lords, Lord Willetts and Lord Stevens, if the Minister can persuade us that they are all implicit in the Bill and are not necessary, then perhaps they could not be moved.
Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Smith of Newnham
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 November 2022.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
825 c84GC 
Session
2022-23
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-11-03 11:54:48 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-11-02/22110269000004
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-11-02/22110269000004
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-11-02/22110269000004