I am not sure I accept the noble Lord’s argument. If an event is properly planned—which it should be, particularly if it is sensitive or controversial—its security implications should surely be considered in advance. If it involves a police presence, that consideration should surely encompass the cost of that police presence. It would be a very remiss institution that did not look at the effects and requirements of the event in the round before it happened.
Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Earl Howe
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 31 October 2022.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
825 c43GC 
Session
2022-23
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-05-24 09:12:23 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-10-31/2211012000079
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-10-31/2211012000079
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-10-31/2211012000079