Exactly. My point about it is that, first, it is the Government’s Bill says there will be this assessment. We are trying to find out is what it actually is, in the interests of transparency—which I am sure the noble Viscount would not disagree with. In terms of costs, there are opportunity costs of other forms and ways of meeting climate change targets. That is the point. You can reject opportunity cost, which means other ways of doing this. I do not think the noble Viscount’s enthusiasm for nuclear—which I understand—should disregard some of the other ways of achieving these objectives.
Nuclear Energy (Financing) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Teverson
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 8 March 2022.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Nuclear Energy (Financing) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
819 c442GC 
Session
2021-22
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-01-05 14:27:12 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-03-08/22030879000032
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-03-08/22030879000032
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2022-03-08/22030879000032