My point is that the whole situation seems to be pretty hypothetical. We are trying to consider what the regulations should be in the event of a no-deal situation, but we do not think there is going to be a no-deal situation. We are also trying to assess the impact of this hypothetical situation without having adequate consultation with those very businesses on which it is going to have an impact. It seems as if we are in Alice in Wonderland, sitting here discussing hypothetical situations. I recognise that the Minister is in difficulties on this point, and it is very hard to be on the Front Bench when you are having to defend hypothetical situations, but the drift of the matter is that we are really wasting everyone’s time, are we not?
Intellectual Property (Exhaustion of Rights) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Kingsmill
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 14 January 2019.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Intellectual Property (Exhaustion of Rights) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
795 c25GC 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-04-20 17:12:36 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-01-14/19011475000041
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-01-14/19011475000041
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-01-14/19011475000041