My Lords, without putting too fine a point on it, I am arguing that in a no-deal situation it needs to be clear that the international exhaustion regime does not apply. That is not clear. The noble Lord, Lord Stevenson, read out some legal analysis, and I have had the same analysis. The concern is that, although it is stated that the regional regime will come into effect regarding our relationship with the EU, there is no statement on any other application of an exhaustion regime. It is therefore quite possible, in the opinion of many IP lawyers, that the international exhaustion regime that existed before our membership of the EU could again come into effect, and the Silhouette case would not apply. That needs to be addressed.
Intellectual Property (Exhaustion of Rights) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Clement-Jones
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 14 January 2019.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Intellectual Property (Exhaustion of Rights) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
795 c22GC 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-04-20 17:12:35 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-01-14/19011475000017
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-01-14/19011475000017
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-01-14/19011475000017