My Lords, before the noble Lord sits down, the question that is coming up time and again in the Grand Committee is: why was formal consultation not conducted before rather than after these regulations were made? With respect, the Minister has not given us a satisfactory answer. He said that consultation is taking place on arrangements concerning the deal, but the Government are telling the House that we may have to enter into a no-deal situation in two months’ time, so how can he say that it is more important to consult on arrangements concerning the deal than on no deal? How can he regard that as a satisfactory point to make to the Grand Committee, when we are being asked this afternoon to consider arrangements for no deal? It leads me and other noble Lords to think that we are not in a position to scrutinise these regulations at all if there has been no consultation nor the ability by the noble Lord to tell us who has been informally consulted by the Intellectual Property Office.
Intellectual Property (Exhaustion of Rights) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Adonis
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 14 January 2019.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Intellectual Property (Exhaustion of Rights) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
795 c10GC 
Session
2017-19
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-04-20 17:12:34 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-01-14/19011440000078
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-01-14/19011440000078
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2019-01-14/19011440000078