UK Parliament / Open data

Laser Misuse (Vehicles) Bill [HL]

Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bills on Tuesday, 23 January 2018, in the House of Lords, led by Baroness Sugg.
Lords committee stage. New clauses debated and withdrawn. Clauses 1 and 2 agreed. Bill reported without amendment.
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
788 cc953-971 
Session
2017-19
Legislative stage
Committee stage
Procedure
New clauses
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Laser Misuse Bill (HL) 2017-19
Tuesday, 19 December 2017
Bills
House of Lords
Deposited Paper DEP2018-0178
Tuesday, 20 February 2018
Deposited papers
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Lord Craig of Radley | 788 c954 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Craig of Radley

1: Clause 1, page 1, line 3, leave out “beam” and inser...

Lord Craig of Radley | 788 cc954-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I will speak to the first group of amendments, Amendments 1, 4, 5 and 7, which are in m...


Show all contributions (43)
Lord Oxburgh | 788 c955 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I rise to support my noble and gallant friend Lord Craig. We should be grateful to him ...

Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood | 788 cc955-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, it is plain that anyone trying to dazzle or distract someone in control of a vehicle by...

Lord Tunnicliffe | 788 c956 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I have to announce that Her Majesty’s loyal Opposition do not have a firm position on t...

Baroness Sugg | 788 cc956-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I understand noble Lords’ intentions in tabling these amendments, as they quite rightly...

Lord Craig of Radley | 788 c957 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank those who have spoken in this debate, and the Minister for her full explanation...

Baroness Randerson | 788 c957 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Baroness Randerson

2: Clause 1, page 1, line 4, leave out from “journey,” to...

Baroness Randerson | 788 cc957-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the amendments in this group all tackle the need to include aircraft control towers wit...

Lord Palmer of Childs Hill | 788 c958 (Link to this contribution)

I need at this stage to mention that I cannot call Amendments 3 or 4 because of pre-emption if th...

Lord Tunnicliffe | 788 cc958-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this group of amendments falls under two issues: one is control towers and control buil...

Lord Monks | 788 c959 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, first, I declare my interest as president of the British Airline Pilots Association. I ...

Baroness Sugg | 788 cc959-961 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I will first speak on the amendments which propose removing the need to dazzle or distr...

Baroness Randerson | 788 c960 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, thank the Minister for what is overall a very positive response. However, I make one fu...

Lord Craig of Radley | 788 c960 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Craig of Radley

9: Clause 1, page 2, line 9, after second “vehicle,” in...

Lord Craig of Radley | 788 cc960-2 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I suggested at Second Reading that a horse-drawn vehicle or carriage should be included...

Lord Tunnicliffe | 788 c962 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I do not have much to say, but I thought I had to say something. I was quite surprised ...

Baroness Sugg | 788 c962 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I greatly appreciate the noble and gallant Lord’s intention to ensure that the Bill is ...

Lord Tunnicliffe | 788 c962 (Link to this contribution)

Further to that argument, how many incidents of dazzled submarines does the Minister have on reco...

Baroness Sugg | 788 c963 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord makes a valid point. I do not believe there are any such instances, but if there a...

Lord Craig of Radley | 788 c963 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I thank those who have spoken in this very short debate. I listened, obviously, to what...

Lord Craig of Radley | 788 c963 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Craig of Radley

11: Clause 1, page 2, line 14, leave out “pilot” and in...

Lord Craig of Radley | 788 cc963-4 (Link to this contribution)

The restriction in the case of aircraft to just “any pilot” at page 2, line 14 of the Bill is not...

Baroness Sugg | 788 c964 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am again very grateful for the experience and expertise of the noble and gallant Lord...

Lord Craig of Radley | 788 c964 (Link to this contribution)

Obviously, I am grateful to the Minister. I thank her very much indeed and look forward to the fu...

Lord Craig of Radley | 788 c964 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Craig of Radley

13: Clause 1, page 2, line 20, at end insert—

““j...

Lord Craig of Radley | 788 c965 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, it is me again with Amendment 13, in my name and in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Mo...

Lord Trefgarne | 788 c965 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I have some sympathy with the noble and gallant Lord on this matter. For example, it is...

Lord Tunnicliffe | 788 c965 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I also hope that the Minister will take this away. One worrying point is somewhere deep...

Baroness Sugg | 788 cc965-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the Government’s intention in the Bill is to cover both when a vehicle is in motion and...

Lord Craig of Radley | 788 c966 (Link to this contribution)

I thank the noble Baroness and others who have spoken in this short debate. Of course, I am very ...

Lord Monks | 788 c966 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Monks

15: After Clause 1, insert the following new Clause—

“Paren...

Lord Monks | 788 cc966-7 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I tabled this amendment because we know from the evidence that we have been able to dis...

Baroness Randerson | 788 c967 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I was pleased to add my name in support of the amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Monks....

Lord Tunnicliffe | 788 c967 (Link to this contribution)

While I have some sympathy with the general direction of the amendment, it touches on a massive s...

Baroness Sugg | 788 cc967-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, parents are not held directly responsible for the criminal acts of their children and I...

Lord Monks | 788 c968 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I draw attention to the term,

“the person knowingly or recklessly permits a child...

Baroness Randerson | 788 c968 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Baroness Randerson

16: After Clause 1, insert the following new Clause—

<...
Baroness Randerson | 788 cc968-970 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this Bill is remarkably narrow in its scope—very much more so than its predecessor, the...

Lord Trefgarne | 788 c970 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am slightly surprised that the noble Baroness got this one past the clerks. Be that a...

Lord Tunnicliffe | 788 c970 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, we broadly support the amendment. We will congratulate ourselves after Report and Third...

Baroness Sugg | 788 cc970-1 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the Government keep safety across all modes of transport under constant review and, alo...

Baroness Randerson | 788 c971 (Link to this contribution)

I thank the Minister for that. For the sake of clarity for the noble Lord, Lord Trefgarne, I thou...

Back to top