I generally support the amendments. I started from a very particular consideration: I wondered whether I would be prepared to be an education administration person, because I think I am qualified to be so. The first thing I would want to know is where my financial backing was. The first thing I would ask for would be a guarantee that I would not end up personally liable, as under normal insolvency law I would be. I would need a back-up. The problem here, as with all public sector bodies—I have been through this before when we were thinking about what to do about a failing nationalised industry—is that if the Government are the guarantor or provider of last resort, the creditors will be perfectly happy but I am not quite certain how the education administrator gets out of it. I do not think I would be prepared to be an education administrator without an underwriting behind me. Mere appointment by a court would not do it for me. Have the Government thought about this bit?
Technical and Further Education Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Cohen of Pimlico
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 March 2017.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Technical and Further Education Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
779 c219GC 
Session
2016-17
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-10-12 15:02:48 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-03-01/17030194000049
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-03-01/17030194000049
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-03-01/17030194000049