My Lords, Amendments 16 and 17 in this group are connected to issues of major concern. They seek to protect communities from extremely controversial decisions in areas with which we are becoming increasingly familiar, for example, fracking and other processes which impact on the environment. Fracking, I guess, is currently the most controversial of these. Similar concerns around minerals, waste development and the like are covered in Amendment 17. The intention here is to make it clear that the regulations which are otherwise authorised by this part of the Bill would not extend to these very controversial areas. In other words, there would have to be primary legislation to embark on changing the position on these particularly controversial areas. Some danger, I think, is sensed at the moment about the Government’s enthusiasm for fracking; their overriding of local authority concerns, for example, in Lancashire, is very controversial. These amendments are designed to constrain the exercise of those powers, which we may see more of under the Bill, in such decisions taken by government over the wishes of local communities, and effectively outside the normal planning process. I hope the Government will rethink their position on these matters. I beg to move.
Neighbourhood Planning Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Beecham
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 23 February 2017.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Neighbourhood Planning Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
779 c472 
Session
2016-17
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-02-27 17:22:05 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-02-23/17022345000367
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-02-23/17022345000367
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-02-23/17022345000367