My Lords, perhaps we could probe this amendment. A lot of the work that we did on the Select Committee referred to HS1, Crossrail and the tunnel. With all his expertise and knowledge, can the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, tell me whether this actually occurred in the case of HS1—the Channel Tunnel route—and Crossrail? Perhaps we should benefit from that, because we frequently went back to the experience of those two projects. There was no point to going through them if you were not going to get some learning from them. Are we trying to reinvent the wheel here or was there a separate way of doing it, which the noble Lord thinks was not good enough and is why he has tabled this amendment?
High Speed Rail (London–West Midlands) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness O'Cathain
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 12 January 2017.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on High Speed Rail (London–West Midlands) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
777 c115GC 
Session
2016-17
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-10-12 15:13:48 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-12/17011271000029
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-12/17011271000029
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-01-12/17011271000029