My Lords, I think that the Minister overlooks the impact of allowing these properties to be re-let, particularly in London but also in other places of high demand where what had been, effectively, social housing will become housing on the market for the maximum rent that can be extracted from it. That is effectively at the cost of those who cannot afford that kind of rent or that kind of property, and who will remain stuck. They are the people who suffer from that regime. I do not think it a great hardship to require of people who are getting a substantial benefit not to then turn themselves into landlords making the maximum profit on a building they have never paid the market rent for. I find that, frankly, rather distasteful. However, clearly, the amendment that I moved is not quite up to the mark, so I beg leave to withdraw it.
Housing and Planning Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Beecham
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 8 March 2016.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Housing and Planning Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
769 c1266 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2016-04-12 14:21:00 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-03-08/16030881000015
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-03-08/16030881000015
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2016-03-08/16030881000015