I am thinking of, for example, the need to build a children’s home or to produce more affordable housing in a community. Often in those circumstances, the local community is in practice very resistant to having that children’s home or affordable housing. In principle, one should consult local people about their local environment and act upon their wishes. In practice, it can sometimes be so difficult to build a children’s home in certain areas that they get built in the worst or least popular areas, where the local community is less likely to be vociferous, because that is where it is possible to do so. In the case that the Minister is arguing about it being so important that we do better for the education of our children and that the academy model—I know that we are debating this—has been shown to be quite effective in improving those outcomes much of the time, does he see that there should perhaps be some flexibility on how much weight one gives to local people in this choice?
Education and Adoption Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Earl of Listowel
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 10 November 2015.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Education and Adoption Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
765 c470GC 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-06-01 13:12:10 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-11-10/15111047000135
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-11-10/15111047000135
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-11-10/15111047000135