I am really quite surprised at the noble Earl, given all his experience and the respect in which he is held in this House. He seems to be suggesting that there is no significant difference between a fatal amendment and a non-fatal amendment. In the time I have been here, which is less than his, there has always been a clear distinction between the two—a “binary” is the word he used in another context. Indeed, the Leader of the House seemed to be unclear in her opening remarks about the distinction between the Lib Dem amendment and the Labour amendment, but the difference is surely fundamental. If he does not accept my proposition, could he at least enlighten the House as to the professional advice from clerks to him and the Conservative Front Bench about which of these amendments are fatal and which are not.
Tax Credits (Income Thresholds and Determination of Rates) (Amendment) Regulations 2015
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Grocott
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 26 October 2015.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Tax Credits (Income Thresholds and Determination of Rates) (Amendment) Regulations 2015.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
765 c1028 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-04-28 14:05:35 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-10-26/15102629000030
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-10-26/15102629000030
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-10-26/15102629000030