I agree entirely with the point made by the noble Lord. Does this not show, though, that our powers on statutory instruments are far too drastic, as was pointed out in the report on conventions? It would be better if we gave up the power to accept or reject a statutory instrument in exchange for maybe two amendments, which would deal with the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Lawson—we could have tweaked it but we could not have opposed it anyway. There may be a lifeboat in this, if we could get something out of it in the way we deal with secondary legislation and avoid all this in future.
Tax Credits (Income Thresholds and Determination of Rates) (Amendment) Regulations 2015
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Rooker
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 26 October 2015.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Tax Credits (Income Thresholds and Determination of Rates) (Amendment) Regulations 2015.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
765 c1015 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-04-28 14:05:32 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-10-26/15102625000041
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-10-26/15102625000041
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-10-26/15102625000041