My Lords, I shall try to put my points briefly. I do not want anything that I say to be taken as implying a lack of sympathy with the concerns of those who have spoken about the effects of the Government’s policy. Like other Peers, I have had moving emails from many such people who expect to lose benefits through the statutory instrument. However, I want to confine myself to the constitutional issue. I usually agree with the noble Baroness, Lady Thomas, about statutory instruments. As has been pointed out, it is a very rare event that the Government are defeated on a statutory instrument; it has happened only five times since the war, but that does not mean that the House could not do it. But there is a combination here, because this is a statutory instrument about a budgetary matter central to the Government’s fiscal policy; it is that combination that is unprecedented, which is why it would be beyond the House’s constitutional powers to defeat the Government today.
Tax Credits (Income Thresholds and Determination of Rates) (Amendment) Regulations 2015
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Butler of Brockwell
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 26 October 2015.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Tax Credits (Income Thresholds and Determination of Rates) (Amendment) Regulations 2015.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
765 c1006 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-04-28 14:05:26 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-10-26/15102618000062
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-10-26/15102618000062
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-10-26/15102618000062