The noble Baroness goes to the heart of the issue; we have a problem with that. We are just not convinced. There are botanicals, to which we have referred. There are other substances, such as nitrous oxide. Does “synthetic” as a term cover what we want it to cover, or will we be reassembled back here at some future date trying to clamp down on another loophole which has been exploited? That is the difficulty. When I say that I am not ruling out the term “synthetic”, that is absolutely correct, but we want to make sure that if the term is used, it is understood in a legal context as achieving the intention of the Bill, which is to uphold a blanket ban. I hope that, with that, I have provided some clarification.
Psychoactive Substances Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Bates
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 14 July 2015.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Psychoactive Substances Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
764 c481 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2015-07-22 15:05:40 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-07-14/15071437000159
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-07-14/15071437000159
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-07-14/15071437000159