My Lords, the noble Baroness, Lady Meacher, is right to avoid the use of the word “novel” or “new”. The problem is that what may be new or novel today may not be so next year. What we are seeking to do in this legislation is to create a series of criminal offences, and the prosecutor will need to be very precise in leading evidence to satisfy the requirements of the definition. A solution along the lines suggested by the noble Baroness, supported by the noble Lord, Lord Howarth, avoids that word, which lacks the precision that is needed. Of course, the word new or novel is widely used in common parlance, but that is not really the test that should be applied for legislation such as this. I am therefore sure that the noble Baroness was right to find some other form of wording, and the one she has suggested avoids that difficulty.
Psychoactive Substances Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hope of Craighead
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 14 July 2015.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Psychoactive Substances Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
764 c470 
Session
2015-16
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2015-07-22 15:04:41 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-07-14/15071437000104
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-07-14/15071437000104
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-07-14/15071437000104