My Lords, I am grateful to the House. Although of course I have ethical objections to the regulations, which are well founded and have been pretty well rehearsed on previous occasions, the Motion in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Deben, does not invite us to vote on the ethics. Therefore, accepting what the noble Lord, Lord Taylor, has just said to the House, I will not explore those ethical issues today but will stick to the points that the noble Lord, Lord Deben, raised earlier on, which concentrate on safety, legality and definitions. In supporting the Motion I want to address three points: procedure, pertinent questions and the specific issues posed by pronuclear transfer—one of the techniques made legal by these inappropriately combined regulations. It is worth saying in parenthesis that there is a third technique, polar body transfer, which was referred to during the discussions that the noble Earl was good enough to arrange for a group of us to have. That is being explored at this time, and will require yet more regulations to come before your Lordships’ House.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Mitochondrial Donation) Regulations 2015
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Alton of Liverpool
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 24 February 2015.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Mitochondrial Donation) Regulations 2015.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
759 c1609 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-04-17 17:19:52 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-02-24/15022472000059
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-02-24/15022472000059
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-02-24/15022472000059