I am very grateful to the noble and learned Baroness for giving way. Can she explain to the House what advantage there would be in referring the matter to which she is now addressing her remarks to a Joint Committee? Take, for example, compliance with the statute that already exists where the regulations are ultra vires. Surely that is a matter for determination by a judge and nothing that your Lordships can say in the House today, or indeed that a Joint Committee could say in its report, would resolve that issue in a way that would tie the hands of a court. I rather suspect, although her knowledge is greater than mine, that the position is exactly the same in Europe. Therefore, I cannot see that referring the matter to a Joint Committee, as the noble Lord, Lord Deben, asks us to do, would advance it except simply to delay the decision on the issue, which would ultimately have to be taken by a court.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Mitochondrial Donation) Regulations 2015
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hope of Craighead
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 24 February 2015.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Mitochondrial Donation) Regulations 2015.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
759 c1598 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-04-17 17:19:43 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-02-24/15022471000048
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-02-24/15022471000048
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-02-24/15022471000048