Recall of MPs Bill
Tuesday, 3 February 2015
Parliamentary committees
House of Commons
Show all related items (5)
Moved by
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town
21: Clause 16, page 11, line 37, at end inse...
My Lords, in moving Amendment 21, I will speak to Amendments 22 and 23 as well. Amendment 21, in ...
Show all contributions (39)
My Lords, I support my noble friend’s amendment. At an early stage this evening, the noble Lord, ...
My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow my noble friend Lord Hughes of Woodside and his wide-ranging...
My Lords, those who have been patient enough to watch these proceedings at Second Reading, in Com...
May I ask my noble friend about binary campaigns? It is not. It is a single-issue campaign. You c...
I suppose the point I was making was that there are only two possible things that you can do in r...
My Lords, again, this debate has ranged fairly widely. I am happy to discuss further with the nob...
The noble Lord mentioned a situation in which a Member of Parliament might have been campaigning ...
I was merely making the de minimis point. Above £500, you have to report. These amounts are then ...
The Minister may or may not be right about the proportion on either side. The principle is surely...
I am merely talking about the difficulty of having one accredited lead campaigner on either side....
If it were accepted that there could be more than one accredited campaigner on each side, would t...
My Lords, I will have to take that one away and think about it. The Government have not considere...
I hope—I think—that I understand him as saying that it is something he will be prepared to look a...
My Lords, I cannot give that assurance at the moment. Between now and Third Reading we have some ...
Before he sits down, I really need to have it from the Government’s mouth that the Minister’s fai...
I understand that. It is a one-horse race, of course. The other does not have a horse at all, so ...
My Lords, it is interesting that it was the Minister himself who mentioned the Transparency of Lo...
Moved by
Lord Kennedy of Southwark
24: Schedule 5, page 56, line 41, leave out “, on ...
My Lords, Amendment 24, which is in my name and that of my noble friend Lady Hayter of Kentish To...
My Lords, the Government are keen to encourage participation in recall petitions, but in allowing...
I thank the noble Lord for that. I am very pleased with the response of noble Lords and, on that ...
Moved by
Lord Gardiner of Kimble
25: Clause 21, page 14, line 27, leave out “(includi...
My Lords, the proposed amendment would alter Clause 21 to remove the power for the Act to be amen...
My Lords, Amendment 25 removes the words “including this Act” from the Bill. The Delegated Powers...
Moved by
Lord Norton of Louth
26: After Clause 24, insert the following new Clause—
My Lords, this amendment provides for a review of the Act five to six years after enactment. It f...
My Lords, I am sympathetic to this: as the noble Lord said, it follows on from my sunset clause p...
My Lords, I agree that the sunset clause would have been preferable; but this could be helpful, a...
My Lords, I rise briefly to support the sentiments expressed by my noble friend Lord Norton of Lo...
I would have preferred the amendment of my noble friend Lord Soley, but this one is eminently sen...
My Lords, I am now trying to think what would tempt the noble Lord, Lord Rennard, to vote with us...
It presumably works when I agree with the noble Baroness’s arguments. Sadly, I may not on this am...
There may have been others when the noble Lord did.
As we said earlier, the idea of reviewi...
Can I please explain why my noble friend is not here? He has not been well of late, and he was ad...
I thank the noble Baroness for that. In return, I send our good wishes for his rapid return—not n...
My Lords, the Government are fully persuaded of the merits of post-legislative scrutiny as a gene...
My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken. The noble Lord, Lord Howarth, is clea...