UK Parliament / Open data

Recall of MPs Bill

Debate on bills on Tuesday, 10 February 2015, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Wallace of Saltaire.
Lords report stage. Bill, as amended, ordered to be printed (HL Bill 94). (Part 2 of 2.)
Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
759 cc1192-1210 
Session
2014-15
Department
Cabinet Office
Legislative stage
Report stage
Procedure
New clauses
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Recall of MPs Bill 2014-15. As amended in Committee.
Monday, 19 January 2015
Bills
House of Lords
The standards system in the House of Commons.
Tuesday, 3 February 2015
Parliamentary committees
House of Commons
Recall of MPs Bill
Tuesday, 10 February 2015
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Recall of MPs Bill 2014-15. As amended on Report.
Tuesday, 10 February 2015
Bills
House of Lords

Show all related items (5)
Deposited Paper DEP2015-0222
Tuesday, 24 February 2015
Deposited papers
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town | 759 c1192 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town

21: Clause 16, page 11, line 37, at end inse...

Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town | 759 cc1192-5 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, in moving Amendment 21, I will speak to Amendments 22 and 23 as well. Amendment 21, in ...


Show all contributions (39)
Lord Hughes of Woodside | 759 cc1195-6 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I support my noble friend’s amendment. At an early stage this evening, the noble Lord, ...

Lord Howarth of Newport | 759 cc1196-8 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, it is a pleasure to follow my noble friend Lord Hughes of Woodside and his wide-ranging...

Lord Grocott | 759 c1198 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, those who have been patient enough to watch these proceedings at Second Reading, in Com...

Lord Hughes of Woodside | 759 c1198 (Link to this contribution)

May I ask my noble friend about binary campaigns? It is not. It is a single-issue campaign. You c...

Lord Grocott | 759 cc1198-9 (Link to this contribution)

I suppose the point I was making was that there are only two possible things that you can do in r...

Lord Wallace of Saltaire | 759 c1199 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, again, this debate has ranged fairly widely. I am happy to discuss further with the nob...

Lord Howarth of Newport | 759 c1199 (Link to this contribution)

The noble Lord mentioned a situation in which a Member of Parliament might have been campaigning ...

Lord Wallace of Saltaire | 759 cc1199-1200 (Link to this contribution)

I was merely making the de minimis point. Above £500, you have to report. These amounts are then ...

Lord Grocott | 759 c1200 (Link to this contribution)

The Minister may or may not be right about the proportion on either side. The principle is surely...

Lord Wallace of Saltaire | 759 c1200 (Link to this contribution)

I am merely talking about the difficulty of having one accredited lead campaigner on either side....

Lord Howarth of Newport | 759 c1200 (Link to this contribution)

If it were accepted that there could be more than one accredited campaigner on each side, would t...

Lord Wallace of Saltaire | 759 c1200 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I will have to take that one away and think about it. The Government have not considere...

Lord Howarth of Newport | 759 c1201 (Link to this contribution)

I hope—I think—that I understand him as saying that it is something he will be prepared to look a...

Lord Wallace of Saltaire | 759 c1201 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I cannot give that assurance at the moment. Between now and Third Reading we have some ...

Lord Grocott | 759 c1201 (Link to this contribution)

Before he sits down, I really need to have it from the Government’s mouth that the Minister’s fai...

Lord Wallace of Saltaire | 759 c1201 (Link to this contribution)

I understand that. It is a one-horse race, of course. The other does not have a horse at all, so ...

Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town | 759 cc1201-2 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, it is interesting that it was the Minister himself who mentioned the Transparency of Lo...

Lord Kennedy of Southwark | 759 c1202 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Kennedy of Southwark

24: Schedule 5, page 56, line 41, leave out “, on ...

Lord Kennedy of Southwark | 759 cc1202-4 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, Amendment 24, which is in my name and that of my noble friend Lady Hayter of Kentish To...

Lord Wallace of Saltaire | 759 c1204 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the Government are keen to encourage participation in recall petitions, but in allowing...

Lord Kennedy of Southwark | 759 c1204 (Link to this contribution)

I thank the noble Lord for that. I am very pleased with the response of noble Lords and, on that ...

Lord Gardiner of Kimble | 759 c1205 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Gardiner of Kimble

25: Clause 21, page 14, line 27, leave out “(includi...

Lord Gardiner of Kimble | 759 c1205 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the proposed amendment would alter Clause 21 to remove the power for the Act to be amen...

Lord Kennedy of Southwark | 759 c1205 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, Amendment 25 removes the words “including this Act” from the Bill. The Delegated Powers...

Lord Norton of Louth | 759 c1205 (Link to this contribution)

Moved by

Lord Norton of Louth

26: After Clause 24, insert the following new Clause—

Lord Norton of Louth | 759 c1206 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, this amendment provides for a review of the Act five to six years after enactment. It f...

Lord Soley | 759 c1206 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am sympathetic to this: as the noble Lord said, it follows on from my sunset clause p...

Lord Howarth of Newport | 759 c1207 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I agree that the sunset clause would have been preferable; but this could be helpful, a...

Lord Rennard | 759 c1207 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I rise briefly to support the sentiments expressed by my noble friend Lord Norton of Lo...

Lord Grocott | 759 c1207 (Link to this contribution)

I would have preferred the amendment of my noble friend Lord Soley, but this one is eminently sen...

Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town | 759 c1207 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am now trying to think what would tempt the noble Lord, Lord Rennard, to vote with us...

Lord Rennard | 759 c1208 (Link to this contribution)

It presumably works when I agree with the noble Baroness’s arguments. Sadly, I may not on this am...

Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town | 759 c1208 (Link to this contribution)

There may have been others when the noble Lord did.

As we said earlier, the idea of reviewi...

Baroness Maddock | 759 c1208 (Link to this contribution)

Can I please explain why my noble friend is not here? He has not been well of late, and he was ad...

Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town | 759 c1208 (Link to this contribution)

I thank the noble Baroness for that. In return, I send our good wishes for his rapid return—not n...

Lord Gardiner of Kimble | 759 cc1208-9 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, the Government are fully persuaded of the merits of post-legislative scrutiny as a gene...

Lord Norton of Louth | 759 cc1209-1210 (Link to this contribution)

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken. The noble Lord, Lord Howarth, is clea...

Back to top