My noble friend rightly chides us to say that we do not want to be overly bureaucratic or impose too many costs. To undertake qualitative and quantitative research on the scale that he proposes in the amendment would add a huge cost, if not to the Government then to the institutions themselves. We are simply saying here that we will set out some guidance and then leave it to the institutions for it to be evaluated. There will be a process—through HEFCE, should that be something that the consultation decides—for progress and how it is implemented to be evaluated. I would have thought that that would be more in keeping with the light-touch, focused approach that we are talking about, rather than avoiding getting drawn into a very bureaucratic approach, which he would rightly reprimand us for.
Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Bates
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 4 February 2015.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
759 c735 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2018-02-07 16:28:04 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-02-04/150204109000007
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-02-04/150204109000007
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2015-02-04/150204109000007