UK Parliament / Open data

Criminal Justice and Courts Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Pannick (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 9 December 2014. It occurred during Debate on bills on Criminal Justice and Courts Bill.

I would suggest that one should look up the average cost of a judicial review application and say that if the individual concerned is contributing less than, say, 10%, 15% or 20% of the costs, then that figure would not lead to any cost implications for that individual. However, I am not the one who is putting forward this proposal; it is surely for the Minister to come forward to the House and tell us what his proposal is. This House voted on Report that it was not satisfied with the Government’s approach. The Government now come forward and invite the House to agree with the other place by reference to this new proposal, and I simply suggest to the House that the Government’s proposal cannot be adequate unless your Lordships are told what the relevant figure is. I beg to move.

7 pm

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
757 c1768 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top