The noble Baroness gave the horrifying image of someone’s rights having to be read to them before they could buy a newspaper. Would her objection to this provision disappear if there were a de minimis element within it so that the transaction had to be worth more than £5 or £25, for example? It would be helpful to know that. Secondly, is the argument that consumers will be confused if they are told that they have more rights rather than less the best that the Minister can deploy, because that is essentially what she said? Given that the noble Baroness, Lady Oppenheim-Barnes, suggested that she might bring this amendment back on Report, it is important that the Minister who is to reply on that occasion deploys some rather better arguments.
Consumer Rights Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Harris of Haringey
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 27 October 2014.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Consumer Rights Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
756 c347GC 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-10-12 15:44:38 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-10-27/14102744000092
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-10-27/14102744000092
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-10-27/14102744000092