My Lords, I stand here as someone who does not share the professional knowledge that some have shown very clearly in this debate; their arguments were clearly and well made. The simple argument from fairness as regards one cohort of prisoners against another has also been referred to, which is also a powerful argument. A very pragmatic argument has also been alluded to, which is that we have within the prison estate this group of prisoners who have good reason to feel unhappy with their lot. That cannot but make their management more difficult for those who are charged with managing them within the prison estate. Therefore, pragmatic arguments as well as what you might call moral and legal arguments are relevant to this case. I am one of those who would wish to support this amendment. Not only would it right a wrong, but it would lead to an easing of the burdens upon those who have responsibilities for the management of our prisons.
Criminal Justice and Courts Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Bishop of Rochester
(Bishops (affiliation))
in the House of Lords on Monday, 20 October 2014.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Criminal Justice and Courts Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
756 c460 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-04-06 11:47:08 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-10-20/14102011000107
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-10-20/14102011000107
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-10-20/14102011000107