My Lords, I agree with much of what the noble Lord, Lord Bradshaw, has said, but of course the problem with the Bill is that under the Government’s current proposals the Office of Rail Regulation—perhaps with a better name—will be not a regulator but simply a monitor. There is no equivalence between the ORR’s relationship to the railways and what is currently proposed. We will come to one of my amendments later on that would allow some degree of regulation of quality, standards, the performance of the road network and road safety. At the moment, though, that is not what the Government envisage, and I would hope that the Minister would explain why. As the noble Lord has indicated, equivalence in our strategic network would appear to be common sense.
Infrastructure Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Whitty
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 8 July 2014.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Infrastructure Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
755 c45GC 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-10-12 15:53:55 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-07-08/14070892000028
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-07-08/14070892000028
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2014-07-08/14070892000028