UK Parliament / Open data

Infrastructure Bill [HL]

My Lords, I need to be rapid in my response, so let me simply say we think an annual assessment of species control orders is too frequent, as we estimate there is only one control order a year. However, we agree that an assessment of how these provisions are working is required. The code of practice will make clear that this assessment should form part of the five-yearly review of the GB invasive non-native species strategy.

We do not accept Amendment 67, which states that there should be a requirement on the Secretary of State to ensure that the environmental authorities,

“have the necessary capacity to carry out species control operations”,

because, at the rate of one order a year, it is entirely feasible for this to be met from existing resources. The environmental authorities are already resourced with this kind of activity in mind.

We do not support Amendment 68, which would remove the requirement for agreements made in relation to a dwelling to be made only by the Secretary of State or Welsh Ministers. We believe that this is an appropriate additional safeguard for the more intrusive use of powers under this regime.

I hope that that reassures the noble Lord, Lord Davies, and that he will withdraw his amendments.

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
755 c97GC 
Session
2014-15
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Back to top