My Lords, I did not expect to convince the Minister, but before he stood up I had a slight hope of convincing the noble Lord, Lord Deben. Clearly, I have none whatever now. However, on a site such as Sellafield there are things that can go wrong that are not related to the handling of nuclear material but that could be fairly disastrous not only for objective reasons in terms of the damage they might do to workers and others on the site, but for the general reputation of the site. The fact that that would then lead to an inability to sue for a breach of statutory duty seems wrong. As the noble Lord, Lord Deben, indicated, I think that it is wrong in other sectors as well. However, we have special responsibility in going through the Bill to make sure that the nuclear sector is not vulnerable to things that government lawyers have changed in other respects that will have a disproportionately negative effect on the image of the nuclear industry. For that reason, I am not happy with the Minister’s reply, but I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Energy Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Whitty
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Thursday, 4 July 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Energy Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
746 c495GC 
Session
2013-14
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-04-15 21:17:48 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-07-04/13070459000061
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-07-04/13070459000061
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-07-04/13070459000061