My Lords, in moving the amendment, I shall speak also to Amendment 17FA. I have now noticed that the point that it seeks to cover is, I think, dealt with in Clause 7(7). Clause 27 is concerned with advisory notices and who can issue them. Under Clause 7(7) it seems clear that, in the case of joint appointments, it can be done jointly or by either one of the joint auditors, which was the point that I sought to cover. The same point comes up with regard to who can make an application for judicial review, although I notice that, in Clause 30, the reference is to the Senior Courts Act 1981. The Audit Commission Act, unless it has been amended since, makes reference to the Supreme Court Act 1981. I ask for confirmation on those points and beg to move.
Local Audit and Accountability Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord McKenzie of Luton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 24 June 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Local Audit and Accountability Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
746 c216GC 
Session
2013-14
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-01-18 16:13:37 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-24/13062416000034
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-24/13062416000034
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-06-24/13062416000034