That was an intriguing reply. The usual reply in circumstances where the Government feel that they have covered all bases is that an amendment is unnecessary, but the Minister did not feel that he could say that. It is striking that, despite his variety of assurances, a simple statement is unacceptable. However, under the circumstances, I will take this away and think about it further. For the moment, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Public Service Pensions Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Eatwell
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 12 February 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Public Service Pensions Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
743 c601 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-02-15 10:56:24 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-02-12/13021266000021
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-02-12/13021266000021
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-02-12/13021266000021