UK Parliament / Open data

Defamation Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 5 February 2013. It occurred during Debate on bills on Defamation Bill.

Moved by

Lord Phillips of Sudbury

10: Clause 5, page 3, line 9, leave out subsections (1) to (5) and insert—

“(1) It is a defence for the operator to show that—

(a) it was not the operator who posted the statement,

(b) the operator took reasonable care in relation to its posting,

(c) the operator did not know and had no reason to believe that what it did caused, encouraged or contributed to the posting of the statement, and

(d) the operator responded to a complaint about the statement with expedition and took such action in relation to the statement as was reasonable in the circumstances.

(2) In considering the reasonableness of a defence under this section, a court shall take into account any steps taken by an operator to establish or adopt, and then to enforce or implement, any anti-defamation code of practice, any complaints procedure and any system for ascertaining and making available to a claimant the identity of any person posting any statement sufficient for the claimant to bring proceedings against the person.”

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
743 c201 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Back to top