My Lords, I thank the Minister for his comments. I note in respect of the first amendment that, while professing that the Government are fully committed to engagement, he still adheres to the idea that somehow by keeping flexibility in whether departments are required to carry out consultation the door is left open to maintaining a lesser standard than is required by the aspirations that he has expressed. We will need to keep this under review. Although I take the point that including a more formal structure for when regulatory statements start and stop might make it more difficult, there is still genuine feeling among businesses that it would be better if the Government would think more closely about the impact of how regulations apply and are started and stopped. We may need to come back to that, but, given what the Minister has said, I am happy to withdraw the amendment.
Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 9 January 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
742 c35GC 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2015-03-26 19:24:27 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-01-09/13010948000024
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-01-09/13010948000024
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-01-09/13010948000024