That is a perfectly reasonable question, and I know that the noble Lord is asking me a question to which he knows the answer—as he often does, because he knows a lot about these things. We cannot be prescriptive about aggravating speeches—sorry, I meant aggravating features. We do not intend to supply that but we have a list of examples which is in the Explanatory Memorandum. I feel sure that things such as deliberate or malicious acts, et cetera, would satisfy the question to which the noble Lord knew the answer before he asked me.
Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Marland
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 10 December 2012.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
741 c243GC 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-11-26 10:42:42 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-12-10/12121016000034
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-12-10/12121016000034
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-12-10/12121016000034