I thank the Minister for that response. I have a query that is not so much on the website. I think he said that the list was kept along with details of the effects of the prohibition order, which I assume means that this person cannot do this, that, or the other. We were asking for the reasons. I hope that he will look at this, even if there is only a recommendation back to the regulator. It is really important that the allegation and the reason why it was found proven is there as guidance for others. I hope that he will look at that and reassure me that the reasons are there, not just the effects of the prohibition order. With those comments, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Financial Services Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 20 November 2012.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Financial Services Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
740 c1775 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-11-26 10:26:48 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-11-20/12112060000105
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-11-20/12112060000105
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-11-20/12112060000105