Yes. The noble Lord seems to be having difficulty. Yes, if the person turns up and learns to read and write, that is a good bargain. We are trying to get rid of the community sentence that suggests that someone clears up rubbish, but after two days he does not turn up and nobody follows it up. The only thing that happens—as I mentioned to the noble Lord, Lord Reid, in the last debate—is that the offender takes the orange jacket to wear as a fashion item at the Saturday night dance. It is that contempt for community sentencing that we are trying to get rid of, but I have no trouble with the illustration that the noble Lord gives, as long as the punishment or the purpose is followed through. The noble Lord knows the problem of illiteracy. If we can build into community sentencing a real sentence with teeth which makes particularly young offenders learn to read and write, it could be a turning point in their lives. The noble Lord does not set me any kind of difficult question by asking for that clarification, as long as the community sentence is effective.
Crime and Courts Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord McNally
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 13 November 2012.
It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL)
and
Debate on bills on Crime and Courts Bill [HL].
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
740 c1437 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-11-26 10:25:09 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-11-13/121113105000015
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-11-13/121113105000015
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-11-13/121113105000015