The person is not necessarily unidentified; that depends on the supplier. I know that those arguments were made in Committee and I accept that it would not be for the adjudicator to impose compensation or the level of it themselves. However, it ought to be open to the adjudicator to be able to say, “It looks as if a supplier or a number of suppliers have been disadvantaged by this practice and the issue should be referred, effectively, to the courts”. That could be part of the recommendatory powers. That is not the central issue on this group of amendments, though; they are really to remove the constraints on the Secretary of State and allow the adjudicator to have a whole range of potential financial sanctions.
Groceries Code Adjudicator Bill [HL] Report
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Whitty
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 16 July 2012.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Groceries Code Adjudicator Bill [HL] Report.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
739 c46 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-11-28 15:23:56 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-07-16/12071619000011
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-07-16/12071619000011
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-07-16/12071619000011