I am struggling with the Minister’s argument that the amendment in my name and the names of other noble Lords jeopardises the independence of the decision-making. All we are seeking to do in Amendment 2 is have a review by the Office of Fair Trading. There is no presumption about what the outcome of the review would be; we are just suggesting that there should be a review. And in Amendment 26 all that is being suggested is a slight change in emphasis. I respectfully suggest to the noble Baroness that it ought to be a happy compromise for the adjudicator to report annually on the effectiveness of the code. If the adjudicator independently thinks that the code is working fine, he or she should say so. If he or she thinks that there is a problem, he or she should say so, every year.
Groceries Code Adjudicator Bill [HL] Report
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Knight of Weymouth
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 16 July 2012.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Groceries Code Adjudicator Bill [HL] Report.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
739 c18 
Session
2012-13
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-11-28 15:23:50 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-07-16/12071614000087
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-07-16/12071614000087
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Lords/2012-07-16/12071614000087