The hon. Gentleman highlights the value of marine energy in Scotland and elsewhere; he and I are absolutely on the same page on that. Does he agree that one thing it would be very helpful for the Minister to take away is the need to clarify the precise size of the pot that will be available specifically for marine energy in the next contracts for difference auction round, CFD AR4? There is a danger that unless there is a specific pot, the marine energy providers will be rather crowded out by other forms of renewable energy.
Nuclear Energy (Financing) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Richard Graham
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 3 November 2021.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Nuclear Energy (Financing) Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
702 c992 
Session
2021-22
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-01-11 10:25:45 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2021-11-03/21110367000633
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2021-11-03/21110367000633
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2021-11-03/21110367000633