My hon. Friend is giving a fascinating tour de force on the history of forensics. She is quite right about the history, and it goes even further back. I know she will recall—although not because she was present—the celebrated case of Dr Crippen, who was alleged to have murdered his wife and fled to the United States. On searching his home, the police found a torso under the floor of the house. Pathologists were unable to identify whether it was male or female. No limbs were ever recovered, the head was gone, and many of the bones of the skeleton had gone. However, on the torso there was a scar that was deemed to be commensurate with medical attention that Dr Crippen’s wife had undergone. Although there was some debate about the scar between the scientists, along with some critical forensic evidence concerning a fragment of pyjama, it led to his return from Canada and the United States, where had had fled, and to his eventual conviction and execution.
Forensic Science Regulator and Biometrics Strategy Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Kit Malthouse
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Friday, 25 September 2020.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Forensic Science Regulator and Biometrics Strategy Bill.
Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
680 c1288 
Session
2019-21
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-04-28 13:57:24 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2020-09-25/2009256000017
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2020-09-25/2009256000017
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2020-09-25/2009256000017